Archaeology; Civilization, Ancient; Despotism; Greece -- History -- To 146 B.C.; Wealth
Polyaenus cannot be decisively confirmed. But still less can he be
decisively discredited. The story itself suggests that its source was
the temple of Zeus Polieus, and a temple founded in the sixth century
may well have kept some record, oral or written, of the days of its
foundation. There is of course the possibility of forgery, but forgeries
generally have some motive, such as gain or glory or love of the
sensational. No such motive can easily be imputed to this narrative of
Polyaenus, whose picture of Phalaris is borne out by notices in various
other writers.
Lucian for instance makes the tyrant a great builder and great financier
and a great patron of the common people[1401]. Lucian’s Phalaris is
represented as defending himself at Delphi against the charge of
cruelty: he certainly utters many paradoxes in so doing; but the point
of the picture is that it is based on the received tradition, and it may
fairly be used as evidence on a question such as that which is being
here considered.
Aristotle classes Phalaris among the tyrants who owed their position to
some high office that they had previously held[1402], a statement which
is good evidence for Phalaris as a historical personage and as far as it
goes accords with Polyaenus.
“When the Agrigentines were rid of Phalaris they decreed that nobody
should wear a blue-grey cloak: for the servants of the tyrant wore
aprons (περιζώματα) of blue-grey[1403].” The prohibition of these
blue-grey aprons makes it look as if the men who overthrew the tyranny
of Phalaris thought it necessary to disband his army of uniformed
employees.
Further the part of the narrative of Polyaenus that most concerns us
here can claim a certain probability from what is known of an early
namesake and fellow-townsman of the Syracusan tyrant Agathocles.
According to Diodorus[1404] this earlier Agathocles, who lived while
Syracuse was still under a landed aristocracy called γεωμόροι, probably
about 700 B.C.[1405],
Being chosen to have charge of the building of the temple of Athena,
picked out the finest of the stones that were being quarried and met
the expense out of his own pocket (τὴν μὲν δαπάνην ἐκ τῆς ἰδίας
οὐσίας ἐποιεῖτο), but misused the stones and built a costly house.
At this they say the divine power gave forth a sign: Agathocles was
struck by lightning and consumed by fire along with all his house.
The Geomoroi confiscated his property to the state, although the
kleronomoi (the financial officials) showed that he had taken
nothing of the monies of the temple or of the state. They devoted
his house to the gods and forbade those who came there to set foot
in it, and to this day it is called the embrontaion (_i.e._ the
place struck by lightning).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account