Archaeology; Civilization, Ancient; Despotism; Greece -- History -- To 146 B.C.; Wealth
Attica in the days of Cylon was divided into forty-eight of these
naukraries, each of which had to provide a ship[1605]. The business of
the naukraroi was however largely financial[1606], so much so that later
writers, who may have known them best from references to them in the
laws of Solon, seem to have regarded them as exchequer officials[1607],
the more so as Cleisthenes replaced the naukraric organization by
demes[1608], which had no naval associations.
Even the etymological connexion of naukrary with ναῦς (navis, ship) has
been called in question. Doubt is first cast on it by Pollux, who wrote
his _Onomasticon_ in the second century A.D.[1609]. Modern writers have
proposed alternative derivations. Grote derives it from ναίω (I dwell),
and explains the naukraroi as the principal householders[1610], a reflex
of the suffrage basis of the nineteenth century. Others[1611] connect it
with an obscure word ναύω, said by Hesychius and Photius to mean “I
beseech,” and connected by Photius with ναός (temple). ναός and ναύω
they connect with a dubious gloss of Pollux[1612], which explains
ναύκληρος (ship’s captain) by the rare word ἑστιοπάμων (householder,
lit. hearthholder), and which they emend by reading ναύκραρος for
ναύκληρος. As further Hesychius defines ναύκληρος (_sic_) as the
president of a community (συνοικία) they connect the origin of the
naukraries with the unification (συνοικισμός) of Attica by Theseus,
symbolized by a common hearth[1613].
These philological doubts have been met by G. Meyer[1614], who argues
that even assuming that ναός means “hearth,” compounds would require not
ναυ- but ναο- or ναυο-. Phonetic analogies all point to a derivation
from ναῦς (ship)[1615]. -κραρος is to be connected with κραίνω (make,
complete) or perhaps with κραίνω meaning “I rule[1616].”
Pollux’s uncertainty about the derivation simply reflects the
uncertainty about the history of the naukraries that was prevalent in
his days. No naval activities of the naukraroi are recorded by any
ancient writer[1617]. But this proves nothing. Naukraries probably had a
long history at Athens, like ship-money in England, and in the course of
time lost their dominatingly naval character.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account