Archaeology; Civilization, Ancient; Despotism; Greece -- History -- To 146 B.C.; Wealth
In his domestic policy Polycrates won great fame as the promoter of
great public works. “I have dwelt the longer on the Samians,” says
Herodotus[396], “because they have erected three works that surpass
those of all the Greeks.” The works in question are the harbour
breakwater already mentioned, the huge temple of Hera, and the
underground aqueduct constructed by Eupalinus of Megara[397]. Herodotus
himself does not say who was responsible for these works being
undertaken; but the context shows that the historian is thinking of the
Samos of Polycrates. The first architect of the temple is given by him
as Rhoecus, the partner of Theodorus, who worked for Polycrates. Great
engineering activities in Samos about this time are indicated by the
fact that the engineer who shortly afterwards bridged the Bosporus for
Darius was a Samian[398]. The breakwater round the harbour is naturally
ascribed to the time of the Samian thalassocracy under Polycrates. There
is therefore little doubt that modern scholars and archaeologists have
been right in identifying these great constructions with the
“Polycratean works” referred to by Aristotle[399] as typical
undertakings of a typical tyrant, the more so as there are numerous
instances of early tyrants undertaking these particular kinds of
work[400].
One work of a similar kind that Samos owed to Polycrates deserves at
least a passing notice, namely the “laura” that he erected as a rival to
what is called in Sardis the Ἀγκὼν γλυκύς[401]. Etymologically “laura”
is probably to be connected with “labyrinth[402].” The word has various
meanings[403]. The laura at Samos appears to have been a place for
buying and selling[404], possibly an early predecessor of the
labyrinthine bazaars still in use in the great cities of the near East
such as Smyrna, Cairo, and Constantinople[405].
If Polycrates’ laura was in fact a great bazaar, it is easy to imagine
how it became a byword for luxury[406] and worse things than that. The
description of it by Clearchus as a place of ill-repute is plainly from
a source unfriendly to the tyrant[407].
[Sidenote: The labour employed on these works appears to have been
mainly free.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account