Archaeology; Civilization, Ancient; Despotism; Greece -- History -- To 146 B.C.; Wealth
Whatever the facts about the laura, the sums that Polycrates spent on
his public works in general and the number of hands that he employed on
them must have been very large. Of the life led by these employees we
know little. Aristotle states that the object of the tyrant’s works was
“the employment and poverty of his subjects[408].” This implies that the
work was ill-paid and unpopular. It is doubtful however whether
Aristotle quite understood the social and economic conditions of sixth
century Samos[409]. On the other hand no inferences as to the normal
wages in the days of the tyrant are to be drawn from occasional
instances of high payments made by him for exceptional work[410]. One
fact however becomes plain from the statement in the _Politics_. The
hands employed by Polycrates must have been mainly free men.
Like some tyrannical employers of labour in more recent times,
Polycrates appears to have recognized the value of having his employees
provided with amusements of not too elevated a type. Holidays and
drunkenness appear to have been frequent under his regime[411]. The
encouragement or permission of unprofitable amusements for the multitude
is of course quite consistent with great severity in other
directions[412], and more particularly with the suppression of the
liberal forms of recreation popular among citizens of the better
class[413].
[Sidenote: The tyrant’s mercenaries.]
He maintained his power by means of mercenaries, native it should be
noticed, as well as foreign[414]. These mercenaries were in all
probability a development of the fifteen men at arms[415] with which he
had seized supreme power, and, like the original fifteen, they were
presumably free men[416].
[Sidenote: His pension scheme for the mothers of fallen soldiers.]
While on the subject of Polycrates’ warlike achievements it is
interesting to note that he did something to put military service on a
sound financial basis by providing for the mothers of soldiers who fell
in his service. The way he did so is described by Duris, a historian of
Polycrates’ own island, who was born about 340 B.C.[417]. “He gathered
together the mothers of those who had fallen in war, and gave them to
the wealthy among the citizens to support, saying to each, ‘I give you
this woman to be your mother.’” No provision was made for the widows;
but from the Greek point of view this was hardly required. They would
naturally be provided for by their second husbands[418]. The method of
financing this popular measure recalls the Athenian liturgies. The
measure itself points to the tyrant’s troops having been free men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account