Archaeology; Civilization, Ancient; Despotism; Greece -- History -- To 146 B.C.; Wealth
To sum up our conclusions about Naukratis: texts and excavations confirm
and supplement one another to the effect that there was an Egyptian
settlement from the beginning of the seventh century, that Greek traders
found their way there almost from the first, and that about the middle
of the seventh century the Greek trading settlement became of
considerable importance[630] through the removal to it of the occupants
of the Milesians’ Fort[631]. Finally about 569 B.C. we have the
concentration in the city of all the Greek traders in Egypt.
[Sidenote: The position of Naukratis under Amasis]
The Greek traders were concentrated by Amasis in Naukratis as a
concession to the Egyptians with whom they had grown more and more
unpopular owing to their influence and success. Amasis had risen to
power as the leader of an anti-Greek agitation[632], and, as Petrie
pointed out[633], the concentration was an anti-Greek move[634]. But
Amasis cleverly contrived that it should be not unpopular, but even the
reverse, with the Greeks. Naukratis as a monopoly city enjoyed an
immense reputation during Amasis’ long and prosperous reign. [Sidenote:
contrasted with its position under Psammetichus.] But the Amasis
tradition cannot conceal the fact that the time when Greek traders got
the freest welcome in Egypt was that of Psammetichus, when Greek
hoplites were being employed to establish the Saite dynasty as rulers of
all Egypt.
[Sidenote: Daphnae and the Greek mercenaries]
In the early days of Psammetichus, when he was overthrowing the
dodecarchy, his Greek merchants and his Greek soldiers probably had
their headquarters together, in the Milesians’ Fort. At Naukratis the
military element does not appear. From about 650 B.C. till shortly after
the accession of Amasis in 570 the Greek mercenaries are found quartered
in a place called The Camps at Daphnae on the most Easterly (Pelusian)
arm of the Nile[635]. The history of the transition from the Milesians’
Fort to Daphnae is obscure[636]; but in a broad sense there can be
little doubt that the Fort was as much the parent of the camp at Daphnae
as of the emporium at Naukratis. Naukratis and Daphnae, the Greek
emporium and the Greek camp, were alike essential to the Saite Pharaohs,
and both had plainly gone far in their development and organization
early in Psamtek’s reign.
[Sidenote: and the Egyptian warrior caste.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account