The shifting of the nasal tube from a ventral to a dorsal position, as
seen in Ammocoetes, is, perhaps, the most important of all clues in
connection with the comparison of Ammocoetes to the Palæostracan on the
one hand, and to the Cephalaspid on the other; for, whereas the exact
counterpart of the opening of such a tube is always found on the dorsal
head-shield in all members of the latter group, nothing of the kind is
ever found on the dorsal carapace of the former group.
The reason for this difference is made immediately evident in the
development of Ammocoetes itself, for the olfactory tube originates as a
ventral tube--the tube of the hypophysis--in exactly the same position as
the olfactory tube of the Palæostracan, and later on in its development
takes up a dorsal position.
In fact, Ammocoetes in its development indicates how the Palæostracan
head-shield became transformed into that of the Cephalaspid.
In another most important character Ammocoetes indicates its relationship
to the Cephalaspidæ, for it possesses an external skeleton or head-shield
composed of muco-cartilage, which is the exact counterpart of the
so-called bony head-shield of the latter group; and still more strikingly
the structure of the cephalaspidian head-shield is remarkably like that
of muco-cartilage. In the one case, by the deposition of calcium salts, a
hard external skeleton, capable of being preserved as a fossil, has been
formed; in the other, by the absence of the calcium salts, a soft
chondro-mucoid matrix, in which the characteristic cells and fibrils are
embedded, distinguishes the tissue.
The recognition that the head-shields of these most primitive fishes were
not composed of bone, but of muco-cartilage, the precursor of both
cartilage and bone, immediately clears up in the most satisfactory manner
the whole {354}question of their derivation from elasmobranch fishes; for
the main argument in favour of the latter derivation is the exceedingly
strong one that bone succeeds cartilage--not _vice versâ_--therefore,
these forms, since their head-shield is bony, must have arisen from some
other fishes with a cartilaginous skeleton, most probably of an
elasmobranch nature. Seeing, however, that the structure of their shields
resembles muco-cartilage much more closely than bone, and that Ammocoetes
forms a head-shield of muco-cartilage closely resembling theirs, there is
no longer any necessity to derive the jawless fishes from the
gnathostomatous; but, on the contrary, we may look with certainty upon
the Agnatha as the most primitive group from which the others have been
derived.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account