Natural history -- Scotland -- Orkney; Orkney (Scotland) -- Description and travel; Orkney (Scotland) -- History
The Dwarfie Stone has been a good deal undervalued by some writers, such
as the historian of Orkney, Mr. Barry; and, considered simply as a work
of art or labour, it certainly does not stand high. When tracing, as I
lay abed, the marks of the tool, which in the harder portions of the
stone are still distinctly visible, I just thought how that, armed with
pick and chisel, and working as I was once accustomed to work, I could
complete such another excavation to order in some three weeks or a month.
But then I could not make my excavation a thousand years old, nor envelop
its origin in the sun-gilt vapours of a poetic obscurity, nor connect it
with the supernatural through the influence of wild, ancient traditions,
nor yet encircle it with a classic halo borrowed from the undying
inventions of an exquisite literary genius.
The pillow I found littered over with the names of visitors; but the
stone—an exceedingly compact red sandstone—had resisted the imperfect
tools at the command of the traveller, usually a nail or a knife, and
so there were but two of the names decipherable—that of an “H. Ross,
1735,” and that of a “P. Folster, 1830.” The rain still pattered heavily
overhead, and with my geological chisel and hammer I did, to beguile the
time, what I very rarely do—added my name to the others, in characters
which, if both they and the Dwarfie Stone get but fair play, will be
distinctly legible two centuries hence. In what state will the world
then exist, or what sort of ideas will fill the head of the man who, when
the rock has well-nigh yielded up its charge, will decipher the name
for the last time, and inquire, mayhap, regarding the individual whom
it now designates, as I did this morning when I asked, “Who was this H.
Ross, and who this P. Folster?”? I remember when it would have saddened
me to think that there would in all probability be as little response in
the one case as in the other; but as men rise in years they become more
indifferent than in early youth to “that life which wits inherit after
death,” and are content to labour on and be obscure.
The sun broke out in great beauty after the shower, glistening on a
thousand minute runnels that came streaming down the precipices, and
revealing through the thin, vapoury haze the horizontal lines of strata
that bar the hillsides, like courses of ashlar in a building. I failed,
however, to detect, amid the general many-pointed glitter by which the
blue, gauze-like mist was bespangled, the light of the great carbuncle
for which the Ward Hill has long been famous—that wondrous gem, according
to Sir Walter, “that, though it gleams ruddy as a furnace to them that
view it from beneath, ever becomes invisible to him whose daring foot
scales the precipices whence it darts its splendour.”
The Standing Stones.
[Illustration: _The Standing Stones—The Ring of Brogar._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account