The minister of Birsay in 1627 says:—“There is likewise ane litill
holm within the sea callit the Brughe of Birsay, quhilk is thocht be
the elder sort to have belongit to the reid friaris, for there is the
foundation of ane kirk and kirkyard there as yet to be
seen.”—Peterkin’s Rentals, No. III., p. 98.
Footnote 194:
Low’s Tour through Orkney and Zetland, MS. in the possession of David
Laing, Esq.
Footnote 195:
See the article on “The Twin-towered Churches of Denmark,” by J.
Kornerup, in the Aarboger for Nordisk Oldkindighed for 1869, p. 13.
Footnote 196:
Detailed accounts of the excavation, with translations and facsimiles
of the inscriptions of Maeshow, have been given in a privately-printed
work by Mr. Farrer, and in a work published by the late Mr. John
Mitchell. An account of the structure of Maeshow, with notices of the
inscriptions, is given by Dr. John Stuart, secretary to the Society of
Antiquaries of Scotland, in their Proceedings, vol. v. p. 247. A
notice, with readings of the inscriptions, by Dr. Charlton, is given
in Archæologia Æliana, vol. vi. p. 127 (1865). See also the splendid
work on The Runic Monuments of Scandinavia and England, by Professor
George Stephens, Copenhagen, 1866-68.
Footnote 197:
Hogboy is the Norse word _Haug-bui_, the tenant of the _haug_, how, or
tomb—a hoy-laid dead man, or the goblin that guards the treasures
buried in the how. (Ordbog det Norske Gamle Sprog, _sub voce_.)
Footnote 198:
The leading specific feature of the Orkney group of chambered cairns
is the formation of small cells or loculi off the principal chamber.
The Caithness group is distinguished by the tricameration of the
chamber, and the Clava group by having a circular or oval chamber
undivided and unfurnished with _loculi_.
Footnote 199:
See Chap. xci.
Footnote 200:
The first par of the word seems analogous to the last part of our own
Carling-wark, indicating astonishment at the amount of labour required
for the rearing of such a structure.
Footnote 201:
In his recent work on Rude Stone Monuments of all Countries (London:
John Murray, 1872), Mr. Ferguson suggests that Maeshow may have been
erected for Earl Havard, who fell at Stennis about A.D. 970. But apart
from its Celtic structural character, if it had been Earl Havard’s
tomb his countrymen could scarcely have so completely forgotten the
fact in the short space of 200 years.
Footnote 202:
The most detailed account of these is to be found in an elaborate
paper on the Celtic Antiquities of Orkney, by Captain F. W. L. Thomas,
R.N., in the Archæologia, vol. xxxiv.
Footnote 203:
Flateyjarbók (Christiania, 1860-68), vol. i. p. 225. See the
translation in the Appendix, p. 208.
Footnote 204:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account