The customary glance was given the bulky documents. Senator Aspgrain
was awaiting the opportune moment to attack the assignment. When it
came, the senator arose with dignity and, addressing the commissioner,
attempted to enter a protest, but was instantly stopped by that high
functionary. A frozen silence pervaded the room. “There is no occasion
for any remarks in this matter,” austerely replied the government
specialist. “Our department regularly awarded the beef contract for
this post to The Western Supply Company. There was ample competition on
the award, insuring the government against exorbitant prices, and the
required bonds were furnished for the fulfillment of the contract.
Right then and there all interest upon the part of the grantor ceased
until the tender was made at this post on the appointed day of
delivery. In the interim, however, it seems that for reasons purely
their own, the grantees saw fit to sub-let their contract, not once but
twice. Our department amply protected themselves by requiring bonds,
and the sub-contractors should have done the same. That, however, is
not the matter at issue, but who is entitled to deliver on the original
award. Fortunately that point is beyond question; an assignment of the
original has always been recognized at the War Office, and in this case
the holders of the same are declared entitled to deliver. There is only
one provision,—does the article of beef tendered qualify under the
specifications? That is the only question before making this decision
final. If there is any evidence to the contrary, I am ready to hear
it.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account