The Oxford Methodists : $b Memoirs of the Rev. Messrs. Clayton, Ingham, Gambold, Hervey, and Broughton, with biographical notices of othersTyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The Oxford Methodists : $b Memoirs of the Rev. Messrs. Clayton, Ingham, Gambold, Hervey, and Broughton, with biographical notices of others
“The point on which we desired all the preachers to speak their
minds at large was, ‘Whether we ought to separate from the
Church?’ Whatever was advanced, on one side or the other, was
seriously and calmly considered; and, on the third day, we were
all fully agreed in that general conclusion,—that, whether it
was lawful or not, it was not expedient.”[114]
Supposing that Ingham wished for an amalgamation, this was a decisive
answer to his proposal, for already Ingham had separated from the
Church, not only by the formation of societies and the employment of
lay preachers, but also, and especially, by the institution of separate
sacramental services.
Some time after the Conference at Leeds, Ingham went to Derbyshire
and Lincolnshire, and thence to Ashby, on a visit to Lady Huntingdon.
During his stay, he preached frequently, at her ladyship’s and in the
neighbourhood, to large congregations. On his return to Yorkshire, the
Countess accompanied him, and visited most of his northern societies.
Whilst she was in Yorkshire, a conference of his preachers was held at
Winewall, when, as at Wesley’s first Conference, in 1744, doctrine and
discipline were discussed.
In reference to _Doctrine_, it was agreed:—1. That Justification consists
in the forgiveness of sins, and an imputation of Christ’s righteousness;
and, that, the instrumental cause of this is faith in Christ. 2. That,
sanctification consists, not in holy actions, but, in the divine
life, new heart and spirit, which are given by Jesus Christ at our
justification; and love, joy, and peace, and all the graces or fruits of
the Spirit. 3. That, all good works spring from this, as fruit from a
tree.
With regard to _Church Government_, it was resolved, That, there should
be a _general overseer_, chosen and appointed by the Trustees and by the
consent of the Societies.
As was natural, Ingham was set apart to this office; and he proceeded to
elect one of the Batty brothers and Mr. Allen, as fellow-helpers; who,
after giving an account of their conversion and call to the ministry,
and, being examined respecting the doctrines they had preached, and
intended to preach in future, were then and there solemnly ordained, by
the laying on of Ingham’s hands, and prayer.
In this respect, Ingham was far ahead of his old friend Wesley; for it
was not till twenty-eight years after this, that Wesley assumed episcopal
functions, by ordaining two of his preachers for America.
From this period, Lady Huntingdon used to call Ingham a _Bishop_; and,
in doing so, her ladyship was not seriously wrong. There can be little
doubt, that, Ingham, like Wesley, held the opinion, that, “bishops and
presbyters are the same order, and consequently have the same right to
ordain”; and, assuming this to be correct, there can be no question,
that, he, being an acknowledged Presbyter of the Church of England, was
also a Bishop.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account