The Oxford Methodists : $b Memoirs of the Rev. Messrs. Clayton, Ingham, Gambold, Hervey, and Broughton, with biographical notices of othersTyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The Oxford Methodists : $b Memoirs of the Rev. Messrs. Clayton, Ingham, Gambold, Hervey, and Broughton, with biographical notices of others
“You see how moderate I am in the matter. I do not exclaim
against the gentlemen who have brought these new doctrines to
our ears. If truth and purer Christianity be on their side,
God forbid, but that I myself and every true-hearted disciple
should go over to their party! Only have a little patience;
tarry thou the issue of things; and let _excitus acta probet_.
“I wonder why they dissuade you from cleaving to the
Establishment. Why do they find fault with our excellent
Church? And why should they entice you from your parish? Sure
we are, that, the Holy Ghost made you overseer over that
little flock; but, that, He has released you from the charge
and called you to another sphere of labour, is not so evident.
There was a time when Mr. Wesley was a warm and able advocate
of the primitive institutions. I marvel, that, he is so soon
removed to another opinion. This is a fresh conviction how
variable his mind is, and, though burning with zeal for God,
yet, given to change. And, having altered so often already, why
may he not alter again, and new-mould his present sentiments as
well as his former?
“They advise you to become an itinerant preacher. But why? I
would gladly know. Is greater perfection to be attained by
wandering into the wide world, and preaching in variety of
places? Or will this way of preaching be more successful and
efficacious? I cannot bring myself to believe this.
“Etc., etc.,
“JAMES HERVEY.”
To some extent, Hervey was evidently misinformed. It is possible, it
is not unlikely, that, Wesley and Whitefield had advised their brother
Methodist, Mr. Kinchin, to become an itinerant preacher; but there is
no evidence, that, they ever wished either him or any of their friends
to leave the Established Church, or, that, they ever entertained the
idea of leaving the Church themselves. Still, there can be no doubt,
that Hervey had heard such reports as these, and was intensely anxious
on this account. Hervey refers to the diffusion of “erroneous and
pernicious notions.” These were, probably, not so much the doctrines of
justification by faith, the witness of the Spirit, and cognate truths, as
the things mentioned in the following letter, addressed to Whitefield,
three weeks after the foregoing letter was sent to Mr. Kinchin:—
“STOKE ABBEY, _May 10, 1739_.
“DEAR MR. WHITEFIELD,—I sincerely thank you for your last
letter. I can hardly bring myself to assent to your whole
account of justification by faith. This, perhaps, may proceed
from some obstinate prejudices, rather than from reasonable and
weighty scruple. However, I waive the mention of my objections,
and make the care of my own right faith give place to a concern
for the principles and practices of my dear friends.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account