The Oxford Methodists : $b Memoirs of the Rev. Messrs. Clayton, Ingham, Gambold, Hervey, and Broughton, with biographical notices of othersTyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The Oxford Methodists : $b Memoirs of the Rev. Messrs. Clayton, Ingham, Gambold, Hervey, and Broughton, with biographical notices of others
“The latter season is approaching, which, you know, madam,
brings abundance of strangers with it. Some invalids resort
to the English Bethesda; some, as lovers of pleasure, to this
mart for all manner of diversions. Every one seems studious
of making a gay and grand appearance. It is, I think, one of
the most glittering places I ever beheld. ‘Anointed with oil,
crowned with rose-buds, and decked with purple and fine linen,’
they sport away their days, chanting to the sound of the viol,
drinking wine in bowls, and stretching themselves on couches
of ivory; and, perhaps, never remembering the afflictions of
Jesus, nor His love, ‘which is better than wine,’ nor His name,
‘which is as ointment poured forth.’
“While they are contriving every art to embellish their
persons, let us, dear madam, give all diligence to be
all-glorious within. While they are studying to outvie the
butterfly and the tulip, let us be animated by higher views,
and put on the Lord Jesus Christ,” etc....
“And now, madam, will you permit me to anticipate a remark
which you will naturally make. Shall I spare you the necessity
of saying, Why here is a sermon instead of a letter.
“Indeed, madam, if it be a sermon, the Bath finery has
furnished me with a text.
“And why, good madam, should not the world expect such
sermon-like epistles from us ministers? Why will not they let
us be comformable to ourselves, and act in character? Would you
not expect to hear of engagements and victories from a soldier
just come from making a campaign? Would any one be surprised to
find a merchant discoursing of foreign affairs, or canvassing
the state of trade? Nay, is it not allowable even for our
tailor and milliner to talk of the newest fashions and most
modish colour? Why, then, should not the agents for the court
of heaven treat of heavenly things? Why should not their whole
conversation savour of their calling? Why should they be one
thing when they bend the knee, and another when they put pen
to paper? Why act one part when they speak from the pulpit,
and quite a different one when they converse in the parlour?
To say the truth, madam, if you do not allow me this liberty,
I may pretend, indeed, but can never act the grateful, the
affectionate, the faithful, humble servant.”
The following is an extract from an enormously long letter, of eighteen
printed pages, addressed to a clergyman, who had been preaching in the
Abbey Church.
“BATH, _August 27, 1743_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account