The Oxford Methodists : $b Memoirs of the Rev. Messrs. Clayton, Ingham, Gambold, Hervey, and Broughton, with biographical notices of othersTyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The Oxford Methodists : $b Memoirs of the Rev. Messrs. Clayton, Ingham, Gambold, Hervey, and Broughton, with biographical notices of others
Hervey was almost fastidious in his literary tastes; and, hence, his
habit of asking his friends to revise his manuscripts previous to
their being printed. There can be no question, that, he went further,
in this respect, than he need have done. Whitefield was a glorious
evangelist; but made no pretensions to being a man of letters. Ryland
was a strong-minded man; but not an accomplished scribe. The Countess of
Huntingdon, in some respects, was one of the most remarkable women that
ever lived; but polite literature was not the orbit in which she shone.
And, yet, Hervey sought “friendly corrections” from the coroneted lady as
well as from the great itinerant, and the Baptist minister. Hence, the
following:—
“Your ladyship is pleased to express a wish, that, I should
proceed, without delay, in finishing my intended work. Be
assured, your wishes, madam, have all the force of a command
with me. I send you the first four ‘Dialogues,’ beseeching you
to peruse them, not with the partiality of a friend, but the
severity of a critic. The like request I have made of others,
and have received their friendly corrections. I am deeply
sensible of my own deficiencies, and, in order, therefore,
to render my work, if possible, fit for public view—meet for
the Master’s use, I shall feel obliged by any corrections
or improvements, which your pen may make. Your ladyship is
at liberty to show the manuscript to whom you please. Your
remarks, and those of your friends, may supply the sterility
of my invention, and the poverty of my language. If you really
approve of what I have sketched, I shall be encouraged to
proceed in my work. May I not hope for the honour of dedicating
it to your ladyship? It would give me singular pleasure
to have any work of my pen patronised by the Countess of
Huntingdon.”[211]
Lady Huntingdon sympathized with the design of Hervey’s book; claimed
the assistance of all those whom she considered capable of suggesting
improvements and useful hints; and transmitted their observations to the
author; but declined the offered dedication. Hervey writes:—
“_July 14, 1753._
“MADAM,—Accept my thanks, for taking the trouble of perusing
my very imperfect manuscript, and my grateful acknowledgments,
for the improving touches and remarks you have made, as well as
for those of your highly valuable friends and acquaintances.
The corrections will be exceedingly beneficial to the work,
and render it more acceptable to the public in general. But,
I confess, I feel disappointed at your ladyship’s declining
to patronise the public attempt of my pen; nevertheless, your
observations are so sensible and just, that, I cannot think of
pressing the matter on your attention, further than to solicit
your prayers for the success of the undertaking, and for the
unworthy author.”[212]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account