The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"Chéradame, André
History
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"
Chéradame, André
Europe -- Politics and government -- 1871-1918; Pangermanism; World War, 1914-1918
On the other hand the national policy of Roumania is influenced in the
highest degree by the two questions of Bessarabia and Transylvania. As
the map on the opposite page shows, Roumania _irredenta_ is composed of
two great racial and territorial elements: about 1,000,000 Roumanians
live in Russian Bessarabia, but 3,700,000 Roumanians inhabit Transylvania
and Bukovina, that is to say, vast regions of Hungary and Austria. The
Roumanian ideal, in its entirety, would evidently be to incorporate at
the same time the Roumanian brothers of the East and the West, but as the
ideal is not practicable, a choice must be made. The partisans of Germany
at Bukarest, led by M. Carp and Marghiloman, maintain that Roumania
should elect for Bessarabia and therefore march against Russia. To this
the practical politicians of Bukarest reply: “We should certainly be
glad to incorporate the Roumanians of Bessarabia also, but that policy
would only be possible if Russia were completely destroyed by Germany,
which has not been done and cannot be done, for the facts so far prove
that Russia could not be decisively beaten. Therefore Roumania cannot be
such a fool as to incur the permanent hostility of the enormous empire
of the Tzar. Moreover, in order to incorporate the 1,000,000 Roumanians
of Bessarabia, we must abandon the 3,700,000 Roumanians of Transylvania,
besides accepting into the bargain the supremacy of the Bulgarians in the
Balkans, since they are the allies of the Central Empires.”
Such are the essential arguments which incline Roumanian opinion to make
a decided choice for the acquisition of Transylvania. In order that the
relations between Russia and Roumania should become cordial enough to
permit of an alliance between St. Petersburg and Bukarest it remains,
perhaps, for Russia to reassure Roumania with regard to the control of
the Straits. It is certainly well understood at Bukarest that after the
enormous sacrifices which she has made Russia cannot consent to remain
bottled up by the Turks in the Black Sea, and that after the peace she
must hold a preponderant position at Constantinople. On the other hand,
it is the interest of all Europe and of Russia herself that she should
ensure for the future a large amount of liberty in the control of the
Straits. I cannot see, therefore, why Bukarest and Petrograd should not
come to an understanding on this important subject.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account