The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"Chéradame, André
History
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"
Chéradame, André
Europe -- Politics and government -- 1871-1918; Pangermanism; World War, 1914-1918
Hence, supposing the Germans were victorious, the Roumanians, who
have been much alarmed by the idea of seeing the Russians installed
at Constantinople, would be confronted by the danger of being soon
entirely cut off from both the Black Sea and from the Mediterranean. The
Bulgarians would take possession of the Roumanian Dobrudja, the Germans
would remain at Constantinople and the Dardanelles, _where they are
already_, and besides they would be dominant at Odessa and the mouths
of the Danube, according to the plan drawn up, as far back as 1844, by
the future Marshal Moltke (_see_ p. 4). The authority of that name may
satisfy the Roumanians that the scheme is no mere fantasy.
Moreover, it is plain enough that were Roumania once encircled, she could
no longer dream of creating, as she so ardently desires to do, a national
industry, since she would be no more than an economic territory reduced
to impotence, a mere dumping-ground for goods made in Pangermany.
To sum up, we see that this is really a question of life or death for
Roumania. A Prussian victory, in fact, would imperil her national
independence in the most direct and indubitable manner. It appears
that the general opinion in Roumania is alive to the danger and to the
necessity of Roumanian intervention in the conflict. It remains to be
seen whether German influences at Bukarest will be adroit enough and
powerful enough to delude the Roumanian authorities into shilly-shallying
till the decisive hour shall have come and gone.
CHAPTER VIII.
GERMAN MANŒUVRES TO PLAY THE ALLIES THE TRICK OF THE “DRAWN GAME,” THAT
IS, TO SECURE THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE “HAMBURG TO THE PERSIAN GULF”
SCHEME AS THE MINIMUM RESULT OF THE WAR.
I. The exceptional importance of the economic union of the
Central Empires, and the danger for the Allies of establishing
a connexion between that union and their own economic measures
after the war.
II. Reasons for the Turco-German dodge of making a separate
peace between the Ottoman empire and the Allies.
III. Why a separate and premature peace with Bulgaria would
play the Pangerman game.
At the moment when this book is published, the Germans have certainly not
renounced the hope of keeping and establishing a definite claim to the
territories which they actually occupy on the West and on the East; but
with their usual foresight they nevertheless contemplate the possibility
of their having to consent to evacuate on the West, let us say, 90,478
square kilometres, and on the East 260,000 square kilometres, in order to
preserve almost entire the principal part of the Pangerman acquisitions,
that is to say, the gains made, directly or indirectly, to the South
and South-east, namely, Austria-Hungary (676,616 square kilometres),
the Balkans (215,585 square kilometres), Turkey (about 1,792,000 square
kilometres). Total, 2,684,201 square kilometres.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account