The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"Chéradame, André
History
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"
Chéradame, André
Europe -- Politics and government -- 1871-1918; Pangermanism; World War, 1914-1918
As for the Greeks, who unfortunately do not form a coherent body (see p.
147), there are several solutions to be considered, with a view to giving
them a fraction of the Ottoman empire, if they throw themselves into the
struggle in the Balkans on the side of the Allies. With regard to the
Arabs, they detest the Turks, who have oppressed them for centuries.
The liberation of the Arabs from the Turkish yoke should therefore be
carried out so far as it is at all possible. As for the Armenians, of
whom several hundreds of thousands have just been massacred by the Turks,
it is clearly impossible to contemplate the continuance of the remnant
of this unhappy people under the iron heel of Enver Pasha, Talaat, and
the rest of that gang. With regard to the six millions, or thereabouts,
of Turks, who represent less than the third of the population of the
Ottoman empire, they really inhabit only Anatolia, that is to say, the
portion of the Ottoman empire included between the Black Sea and the
Mediterranean. Everywhere else the Turks are merely hated officials, who,
ever since the conquest by the Osmanli Sultans, have cynically sucked dry
the other populations of the Ottoman empire. No doubt the Turkish peasant
of Anatolia, when he is not a prey to one of those paroxysms of religious
fanaticism which seize him periodically, is generally a good fellow. Very
sober and long-suffering he makes an excellent soldier, but the mental
apparatus of your Anatolian Turk is several centuries behind the time. He
is incapable of self-government in our modern age. It is true that there
are some thousands of Turks who make excellent employees in the service
of the Ottoman Debt, but only on condition of their being constantly
supervised and directed by European heads of departments. Among the
Turks of Constantinople there is not a single group offering any serious
guarantee for the guidance of the Turkish masses. If the Turkish
peasant of Anatolia is undoubtedly endowed by nature with some sterling
qualities, it is equally certain that the Turks of Constantinople, with
few exceptions, are corrupt to the marrow of their bones. In these
circumstances to imagine that a really independent Turkish empire could
be set up is to nurse an absurd chimera. As for Constantinople, it is
not even a Turkish city; it is essentially cosmopolitan. Its 1,200,000
inhabitants consist of Turks (43 per cent.), Armenians (18 per cent.),
Greeks (17 per cent.), Jews (16 per cent.), Europeans, Levantines, and
miscellaneous peoples (6 per cent.).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account