The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"Chéradame, André
History
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"
Chéradame, André
Europe -- Politics and government -- 1871-1918; Pangermanism; World War, 1914-1918
It is as clear as daylight that the expedition to Mexico is a German
trap; hence the United States have every reason for awaiting the end
of the European war before committing themselves further in that
direction. On the other hand, _now that the Allies have gripped Germany
by the throat, the Government of Washington should avail itself of this
exceptional opportunity for carrying out with the utmost speed the
destruction of that criminal and parasitic organization which the Germans
have contrived to plant in the soil of the United States_. To arrest
the ringleaders who have been guilty of inciting to treason and crimes
against the common law, _whatever their social position or wealth may
be_; to suppress the associations which are nothing but agencies of the
Berlin government—these are tasks which the Americans have every motive
for accomplishing without delay.
Obviously, too, when the United States shall have wakened up to the
truth, they will acknowledge it to be at once their interest and
their duty to give the Allies all material succour, since nothing but
their complete victory over Germany can safeguard for the future the
independence of the United States.
In the financial sphere the United States can offer the Allies immense
facilities for raising loans, which would be particularly opportune.
Mr. Guthrie, Vice-President of the French-American Committee at New York,
has explained as follows the method, at once delicate and ingenious,
whereby the United States could and should, according to him, give their
financial support to France. “The historian Perkins,” says Mr. Guthrie,
“states that the expenses incurred by France in liberating America
amounted to 772 million dollars. Of this enormous outlay, which ruined
the Royal Treasury, not a stiver was ever repaid to France. She never
claimed it, and to-day she would proudly refuse to be repaid, reminding
us that, in the treaty of alliance of 6th February, 1778, she stipulated
that she should receive no indemnity for her help and her sacrifices....
The generosity of that treaty was unprecedented in the history of the
world.... Would it not be supremely just if the American people, a
hundred and thirty-four years after the battle of Yorktown, recognized
that service—I will not call it debt—by offering the French people
commercial credit to the amount of the principal, that is to say 772
million dollars, to be repaid at France’s convenience? It would be only
the equivalent of a contribution of seven and a half dollars from each
citizen of the United States, much less than the tax that was voluntarily
and cheerfully paid by the French people to help us in the eighteenth
century. Would it not be noble and glorious, honourable alike to head and
heart, if the great American bankers could have proclaimed to the world
that they had fixed the figure at 772 million dollars in gratitude for
the past?” (see _Revue du XVIII. siècle_, janvier-avril, 1916).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account