The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"Chéradame, André
History
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"
Chéradame, André
Europe -- Politics and government -- 1871-1918; Pangermanism; World War, 1914-1918
As it is no longer possible to question either the reality or the
extent of the plan of universal domination pursued by the Germans, it
follows that all civilized States are undoubtedly concerned in the
defeat of Prussianized Germany, since a German victory would have a most
detrimental effect on their interests. Accordingly, the Neutral States
whose independence would be especially threatened by the accomplishment
of the “Hamburg to the Persian Gulf” scheme, have a really vital interest
in the continuance of the war by the Allies till a complete victory
crowns their arms. Such a decisive victory is a necessity not only for
Europe, but for the whole world, since the achievement of the “Hamburg
to the Persian Gulf” scheme would have world-wide consequences (see p.
107). That victory should have for its main object to deliver the world
from the Pangerman peril, and therefore to prevent any future outbreak of
the intolerable ambition of the Hohenzollerns. The victory of the Allies
involves a pledge to destroy the “Hamburg to the Persian Gulf” project,
which forms the indispensable but sufficient basis of the whole Pangerman
plan.
V.
_The plan of slavery pursued by Germany is now so manifest that neutrals
or Germanophile groups are henceforth morally responsible for their
sentiments before the civilized world._
The neutrals who, in the first part of the war, displayed sympathy for
Germany, were excusable because they were deceived; but now they are in
a different position. The facts are patent. It is no longer possible for
anyone to see in Prussianized Germany anything but a ferocious burglar
and assassin practising his trade of robbery and murder at the expense
of the whole commonwealth of nations. In the fine phrase of M. Paul
Hyacinthe Loyson, Can neutrals be neutral in the face of crime? Clearly
not. As the _Daily Telegraph_ said very justly: “_Those who refuse to
occupy a vacant seat at the Round Table of chivalry will have to render
an account at the judgment bar of Humanity._” As matters now stand, in
face of the crimes committed by the “miscreants of Central Europe”—the
phrase is that of the Dutchman M. Schroeder—neutrals cannot support
Germany in any way without rendering themselves her accomplices.
This truth is made so manifest by the course of events that already a
change is coming over two neutral countries, which had been thought
Germanophile. Spanish opinion, a part of which had long been deceived by
the German propaganda, is coming round more and more. Sweden, which the
pressure and the audacious temptations of Berlin all but plunged into
the strife, to the great benefit of Pangermany, is now anxious not to
separate her cause from that of civilization; her responsible leaders
have just proclaimed that Sweden will maintain a strict neutrality.
VI.
_The declarations of the Allies, the accomplishment of the “Hamburg to
the Persian Gulf” scheme, and the question of Austria-Hungary._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account