The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"Chéradame, André
History
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"
Chéradame, André
Europe -- Politics and government -- 1871-1918; Pangermanism; World War, 1914-1918
The nationalities of Europe must be liberated from the Prussian
yoke.
But, as we have proved, the accomplishment of the “Hamburg to the Persian
Gulf” scheme has two essential objects:—
A formidable extension of Prussian militarism, which would have
at its disposal an army of 15 to 21 million men (see p. 91);
The enslavement to Germany of all the non-German nationalities
lying between the south of Saxony and the Persian Gulf.
The objects of the war pursued by the Allies and those of the government
of William II. are therefore fundamentally opposed to each other. This
opposition has been by implication excellently stated by M. Marcel
Cachin, Socialist deputy, in an article which appeared in _L’Humanité_,
of May 9th, 1916, under the title “Central Europe.”
“The general plan of our enemies can be clearly defined. In case they
were victorious, they would establish in the heart of Europe a formidable
power under the supremacy of Germany, a power which, with the annexations
avowedly aimed at, would comprise more than 130 millions of inhabitants.
“It needs no big words to show the danger which the whole of Europe
would run were such a design executed. It would be an eternal menace
to our country. No one can for a moment doubt that so long as the
existing political systems of Germany and Austria endure, such a
monstrous combination would be a permanent danger against which we should
constantly be obliged to be on our guard. And as for the Slav populations
reduced again to slavery, as for the Czechs, the Poles, the Yougo-Slavs,
the Serbians, they would naturally think of nothing but of revenge in
order to escape from serfdom and recover their national rights, which had
been trampled under foot. Were such a brutal unification as is summed up
in _Mitteleuropa_ to be unfortunately accomplished by fire and sword, we
might talk of peace after the storm, but it would be talk in vain; it
would be war again, fatal war.”
There spoke sound sense. It is clear that to have done once for all with
Prussian militarism is the only way open to the Allies to procure a
reasonable guarantee that so atrocious a war shall never be waged again,
and that millions of men shall not once more be sacrificed to the Moloch
of Pangermanism. Hence the official declarations of the Allies, quoted
above, are not the product of blind obduracy, as the German propaganda
would make some neutrals believe. In view of the formidable plan of
universal domination which the Germans still cling to, the seeming
obduracy of the Allies is on their part the highest wisdom.
VII.
_The question of Austria-Hungary, being the crucial point of the whole
problem to be solved after the war, may become the common ground on
which all common efforts should be concentrated, not only by the present
Allies, but also by the still neutral States which are virtually
threatened by the accomplishment of the “Hamburg to the Persian Gulf”
scheme._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account