The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"Chéradame, André
History
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"
Chéradame, André
Europe -- Politics and government -- 1871-1918; Pangermanism; World War, 1914-1918
In any case, those who are fighting for the purpose of putting an end
to great armaments would find themselves once more plunged into the
vortex of the most rigorous militarism, for they could not contend with
Great Germany except at the cost of formidable armaments, which would
absorb all their resources and all their attention. Now, would they be
in a position to undertake such armaments in the infinitely difficult
financial situation in which, according to hypothesis, they would stand?
(see p. 86). Would they even have the resolution to undertake them, after
the frightful moral disappointment of their peoples, who would learn too
late the enormous mistake committed by their governments in negotiating
peace on the basis of the so-called “Drawn Game,” which would have
enabled Berlin to carry out its scheme of domination “from Hamburg to the
Persian Gulf”?
Besides, even if the Allies were willing to attempt once more the
overthrow of the atrocious Prussian militarism, now much more oppressive
than before the war, Great Germany would certainly not give them time to
prepare for it.
We may be quite sure that the day peace was concluded on the basis
supposed, Berlin would set about organizing economically and militarily,
with the utmost speed, the immense territory over which its supremacy
would be extended. Supposing that Russia, France, England and Italy were
disposed to renew the conflict, they would, in the assumed financial and
moral situation, be certainly reduced to impotence before they could make
head against the new German colossus.
Finally, it would be ignoring completely the tenacity and ambition of
the Hohenzollerns to imagine that Great Germany, once mistress of an
empire from Hamburg to the Persian Gulf, would sincerely renounce the
ambition of dominating the North Sea and the English Channel. Hence the
evacuation of Belgium and the retrocession of Alsace-Lorraine, which on
our hypothesis Germany would have yielded to France, would only have
been temporary. The apparent capitulation of Berlin would have been,
therefore, nothing but a cunning device to allow Germany, driven almost
to bay, to recover herself for a renewal of the struggle. Indeed, she
is already preparing for it in union with her actual allies. _La Nation
Tchèque_, of 15th March, 1916, an excellent review edited by M. Ernest
Denis, professor at the Sorbonne, brought to light the following fact.
On the 29th February, 1916, the Chamber of Commerce of Budapest met,
all members being present, in order to study what measures to take for
a future war intended to complete the insufficient results of a peace,
looked upon as “imperfect.” In this discussion it was stated that with
the prospect of a fresh conflagration the States allied to Germany in the
present war must form an Economic Union.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account