The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"Chéradame, André
History
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"
Chéradame, André
Europe -- Politics and government -- 1871-1918; Pangermanism; World War, 1914-1918
All the measures tending to force Austria-Hungary into the German
_Zollverein_, which would make its political absorption inevitable, must
be looked upon as a farce, a simple act of criminal violence done to
the wishes of the immense majority of the populations in the Hapsburg
monarchy. So true is this, that certain Magyar noblemen, who up to the
present have been decided allies of Berlin, are already uttering protests
against the Prussian yoke, understanding at last that it is to be imposed
upon them. Count Theodore Batthyany, vice-president of the Independent
Left of the Hungarian Chamber, declared at the end of March, 1916: “It
is often said among us that the future Customs-Union would create in our
country better economical conditions. This is much more true for Germany,
who will hold both the reins and the whip in the combination.... Besides
the Germans make no secret of it that in the proposed compact there will
be other agricultural states which will be our future competitors (in
allusion to Turkey and the Balkan States). Certainly, from the time that
the union is concluded, all capital will come to us from Germany and
never from elsewhere. The Germans will have the monopoly of capital among
us, and you know what a monopoly is and what it costs. The money will
cost us dear” (_Le Temps_, 1st February, 1916).
In Austria, M. Nemetz, President of the Chamber of Commerce at Prague,
declared: “None of the arguments adduced in favour of a Customs-Union
with Germany will for a moment bear the light of criticism. An
insuperable obstacle is opposed to an intimate Customs-Union between
the two empires: their interests are not identical but on the contrary
competitive” (quoted by _Le Temps_, 9th February, 1916).
These categorical declarations prove what resistance the Pangerman
manœuvre has already to encounter. The Allies have much to gain from
these statements, for they prove the reality of the deep opposition
existing between the interests of Pangerman Germany and those of the
majority of the Austro-Hungarian peoples.
But there remains an essential point to prove, for it gives rise to
special anxiety in the minds of that part of the public in the Allied
countries which still harps on the false idea that Austro-Hungary is a
specially German country. This section of the public doubts whether the
application of the principle of nationalities, which the Allies demand,
would not have the effect of necessarily and considerably increasing
Germany by incorporating in it the Germans of the Hapsburg empire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account