The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"Chéradame, André
History
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"
Chéradame, André
Europe -- Politics and government -- 1871-1918; Pangermanism; World War, 1914-1918
The map printed above is a document of the highest importance, for it
enables us to detect the real policy, first of Bulgaria, and next of the
other Balkan States. This map is an exact translation and reproduction of
the map which is to be found on p. 56 of the historical part of a book
published in Bulgarian at Sofia and called: _The Soldier’s Companion_,
_Manual for the Soldiers of all arms_. This is an official work of
propaganda in the army, and therefore in the whole Bulgarian people,
since all Bulgarians go through the ranks; and it was published in
obedience to order No. 76 of March 14th, 1907, issued by the Bulgarian
Ministry of War, approved and authorized by the Chief of the Headquarters
Staff of the Bulgarian army. This manual has been recommended by the
Bulgarian Ministry of War, in circular No. 28 of March 21st, 1907. Hence
we are confronted with an official Bulgarian book dating from 1907, which
proves very clearly beyond the possibility of dispute the ideas which
have been systematically instilled into the whole Bulgarian people for at
least nine years.
In this map, entitled Great Bulgaria, which is coloured in the eighth
edition of the Bulgarian original, the part said to be “already set free
by the Bulgarians” is coloured pink (represented by large hatchings on
our map), and the parts said to be “not set free by the Bulgarians” are
coloured red (represented by closer hatchings on our map). This official
Bulgarian document helps us to understand, both what happened in the
Balkan wars, and the conduct of the government of Sofia during the
European war.
In fact, when in 1912 the Bulgarians entered into an alliance with the
Greeks and Serbians against Turkey, they were not even then true to
their Allies. At that time they had a very low opinion of the Greeks and
Serbians as soldiers. But they thought it very expedient to employ the
forces of these nations against the principal enemy, Turkey, intending
afterwards to settle accounts with their temporary allies by means of the
increase of power which they expected to gain at the expense of Turkey.
As these intentions were suspected at Belgrade and Athens, it may easily
be conceived that from the very beginning of their joint action the
Greek and Serbian governments did not repose full confidence in that of
Sofia. The distrust of the Greeks and Serbians was, moreover, thoroughly
aroused when King Ferdinand, before he allowed his troops to hurl
themselves against the lines of Chataldja, disclosed his claim to enter
Constantinople, with the evident intention of staying there if he could.
Given the Bulgarian claims in the west, which are set forth in our map,
we can further explain why in 1913 the Bulgarians, whose character is
hard and unyielding, refused all compromise when the Serbians, excluded
by Europe from the Adriatic, demanded from the Bulgarians an equitable
compensation to the south of Uskub.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account