The Paper Currency of England Dispassionately Considered: With Suggestions Towards a Practical Solution of the DifficultyHaslam, John (of Dublin)
History
The Paper Currency of England Dispassionately Considered: With Suggestions Towards a Practical Solution of the Difficulty
Haslam, John (of Dublin)
Currency question -- Great Britain
a condition, this measure would have been insisted on; but however
that may be, it is indisputable that had the reserve in the banking
department been small at that period, or had not the Bank lent out the
notes as fast as they were received, the effect of the restrictive
clauses of the Act of 1844 was such, that the lodgments could not
possibly have been made at all; and even as it was, the difficulty of
effecting then occasioned great anxiety in the public mind.[G] And
similar cases may at any time arise, in which the operation of the Act
must necessarily produce considerable inconvenience to the public.
[F] “About the same time the Government had occasion to borrow
of the banking department about £3,500,000 to pay the
April dividends. The banking department, consequently,
for a while, limited their discounts; and even refused
to grant loans on Exchequer bills. Great pressure was
consequently felt, though it did not last for a long time.
Now it is alleged that if the Act of 1844 had not existed,
the Directors would have allowed the gold to be exported
without _immediately_ contracting the notes in circulation.
They would have lent the money required by the Government,
without refusing the loans and discounts to the public:
and the contraction of the circulation, by being extended
over one or two months, instead of a few weeks, might
have produced no inconvenience,”--_Practical Treatise on
Banking_, by J. W. Gilbart. F.R.S. Fifth Edition. Page 129.
[G] “Had the Act of 1844 not been in existence, the Bank of
England (as in the case of the West India loan, and of
previous loans) might have lent out the money before the
time of payment arrived, and no apprehensions would have
been entertained. The notes in circulation would have been
largely increased for a few days, and then again have
subsided to the former amount. As it was, the payment was
not made through any virtue in the Act; and had it been
required under different circumstances, or when the banking
department had a smaller reserve, it could not have been
made at all.”--_Practical Treatise on Banking_, by J. W.
Gilbart, F.R.S. Fifth Edition. Page 128.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account