The Paris Sketch Book of Mr. M. A. Titmarsh; and the Irish Sketch BookThackeray, William Makepeace
General
The Paris Sketch Book of Mr. M. A. Titmarsh; and the Irish Sketch Book
Thackeray, William Makepeace
Ireland -- Description and travel; Paris (France) -- Description and travel
‘And suppose the murderer had succeeded in his criminal projects,
what fruit could he have drawn from them?--Leaving on the road the
two bleeding bodies; obliged to lead two carriages at a time, for
fear of discovery; not able to return himself, after all the pains
he had taken to speak, at every place at which they had stopped, of
the money which his master was carrying with him; too prudent to
appear alone at Belley; arrested at the frontier, by the excise
officers, who would present an impassable barrier to him till
morning,--what could he do, or hope to do? The examination of the
car has shown that Rey, at the moment of the crime, had neither
linen, nor clothes, nor effects of any kind. There was found in his
pockets, when the body was examined, no passport, nor certificate;
one of his pockets contained a ball, of large calibre, which he had
shown, in play, to a girl, at the inn at Mâcon, a little
horn-handled knife, a snuff-box, a little packet of gunpowder, and
a purse, containing only a halfpenny and some string. Here is all
the baggage, with which, after the execution of his homicidal plan,
Louis Rey intended to take refuge in a foreign country.[9] Beside
these absurd contradictions, there is another remarkable fact,
which must not be passed over; it is this:--the pistol found by Rey
is of an antique form, and the original owner of it has been found.
He is a curiosity-merchant at Lyons; and, though he cannot affirm
that Peytel was the person who bought this pistol of him, he
perfectly recognises Peytel as having been a frequent customer at
his shop!
‘No, we may fearlessly affirm that Louis Rey was not guilty of the
crime which Peytel lays to his charge. If, to those who knew him,
his mild and open disposition, his military career, modest and
without a stain, the touching regrets of his employers, are
sufficient proofs of his innocence--the calm and candid observer,
who considers how the crime was conceived, was executed, and what
consequences would have resulted from it, will likewise acquit him,
and free him of the odious imputation which Peytel endeavours to
cast upon his memory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account