The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
If Clay had failed to embarrass the Administration on the tariff, the
keen Jacksonian politicians were to be more successful in embarrassing
Clay on the land question. This was a peculiarly delicate subject for
Clay to touch in the midst of the campaign. In the Southern and Western
States more than 1,090,000,000 acres remained the property of the
National Government--a vast empire. The proceeds from the sale of these
lands had been originally dedicated to the payment of the national debt;
and now with the extinguishment of the debt in sight, all manner of
schemes were advanced as to the future disposition of the lands and the
proceeds. For a number of years Benton, with characteristic tenacity,
had been urging his plan of graduated prices, with free grants to actual
settlers, and he had won Jackson over to his theory with Edmund Burke’s
proposition, advanced in his speech on the disposition of the crown
lands in England, that the principal revenue to be had from uncultivated
tracts “springs from the improvement of the population of the kingdom.”
The sturdy Missourian looked with repugnance upon the idea of
considering these uncultivated acres as sources of revenue, rather than
as an opportunity for settlers, and he gradually converted the
Democratic Party to his point of view.
To make matters all the more embarrassing to Clay, his party had been
placed in the position of deliberately withholding this vast domain from
the axe of the pioneer and the spade of the cultivator, in the interest
of the manufacturers of the East. This had resulted from the unfortunate
wording of an official report of Richard Rush, a colleague of Clay’s in
the Cabinet of Adams, in which he had lamented the preference of the
American people for agricultural over manufacturing pursuits. The report
had been referred to Clay whose practiced political eye instantly saw
the possibilities in the perversion or exaggeration of the meaning of
these paragraphs, and he had fruitlessly urged their elimination. The
Democrats were quick to grasp their opportunity. The protectionists,
Clay and his friends, planned that the National Government should, by
holding on to the lands, retard their settlement by maintaining prices
prohibitive to the settler; they proposed to maintain a large labor
market in the industrial labor centers of the East where competition
would be keen enough to keep down wages. For the sake of the protected
interests, they were ready to sacrifice the opportunities of the poor of
the Eastern cities and make them the galley slaves of the factories;
retard the development of the West, and immolate the national interest
on the altar of greed. And there was just enough truth in these charges,
rather luridly put forth, to make them exceedingly dangerous in a
presidential year.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account