The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
In the interval between the two conventions, the Anti-Masons clung
desperately to the hope that Clay would do violence to his dominating,
domineering disposition by sacrificing himself. He was an intimate
friend of Wirt’s. Their views on fundamentals were alike. With Wirt
elected, Clay would be the power behind the throne. With a divided
opposition, Jackson’s election would be inevitable, and Clay hated him
with a consuming hate. For identical reasons the Whigs hoped that, on
the nomination of Clay, Wirt would retire in his favor. As the Whig
convention approached, Wirt abandoned all hope of his own nomination.
“There seems to be no doubt of Mr. Clay’s nomination in the convention
next week,” he wrote to Judge Carr. “So be it. In a personal point of
view I shall feel that I have made a lucky escape.”[496] After the
nomination of Clay, it was the ardent wish of Wirt to withdraw. His
intimations to his party’s leaders only brought the assurance that were
the party dissolved there “were not enough Clay men among them to touch
New York or Pennsylvania, nor consequently to elect Mr. Clay,” and he
was reluctantly forced to the conclusion that “there [was] no more
chance for Mr. Clay with the Anti-Masons than for the Pope of
Rome.”[497] But the absurdity of his situation annoyed him, and he was
soon wishing for “a little villa in Florida, or somewhere else, to
retire to, and beguile the painful hours, as Cicero did, in writing
essays.”
If he remained in the field, it was because Henry Clay preferred it. The
relations of the ostensible rivals were close and confidential
throughout the campaign. Clay feared that Wirt’s withdrawal would be
ascribed to his influence, and would intensify the Anti-Masonic feeling
against him. Then, again, the Whig board of strategy planned to deprive
Jackson of the electoral vote of New York and Pennsylvania through an
ingenious combination of the two opposition parties in those States. In
New York the proscriptive party, meeting first, endorsed its national
nominees, and nominated leaders of their own for Governor and
Lieutenant-Governor. With great cunning they selected an electoral
ticket, including Chancellor Kent, an idolater of Clay. The Whigs
followed, and accepted the Anti-Masonic ticket, and thus the Opposition
was consolidated in the Empire State. There was no mystery as to the
intent in regard to the State ticket--it was to have the united support
of both parties. The weakness, with the public, was the absence of any
indication as to the intended disposal of the electoral vote. The plan
of the conspirators was to throw the electoral votes to Wirt provided
there was a possibility of his election, or no possibility of the
election of either Wirt or Clay; and for Clay in the event Wirt could
not win and the Whig nominee could with the electoral vote of New
York.[498] The plan met with the hearty approval of Clay, who
entertained high hopes of its success in depriving Jackson of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account