The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
It is significant of Whig hopes, that, when Tyler wrote and Ritchie was
supporting the President, John Hampden Pleasants, the editor of the
“Richmond Whig,” and an intimate of Clay’s, was denouncing the
principles enunciated by Jackson and Livingston.[559] Resolutions were
adopted by the Legislature denouncing both Nullification and the
Proclamation.
Nor was Jackson indifferent to the attitude Virginia might assume. He
planned to isolate South Carolina, and he feared an alliance with
Virginia more than with any other State. Wishing to reach the Virginians
as speedily as possible, he called upon Lewis Cass to prepare a letter
in the form of an appeal to be published in Ritchie’s “Richmond
Enquirer.” Within a few days after the appearance of the Proclamation,
Virginians were reading a letter described by Ritchie as from “one of
the ablest men in the country.” Making no defense of the tariff, but
pointing out the impossibility of the radical changes demanded being
made within the limited time allowed by the Carolina politicians, he
suggested that “Virginia might interpose most efficaciously, and add
another leaf to the wreath which adorns her civic chaplet,” if her
Legislature would appoint a committee to proceed to South Carolina and
“entreat her convention ... to recall its late steps, and at all events
to delay her final action till another trial is made to reduce the
tariff.”[560] This was to lead, a little later, to the adoption of a
similar plan.
Strange as it may now seem, the position of Virginia prevented New York
from endorsing the Proclamation unqualifiedly, through her
Legislature--and thereon hangs a tale of the political cunning of Martin
Van Buren. In the Empire State the Proclamation had been received with
enthusiasm. Even so bitter a partisan as Philip Hone poured forth his
admiration and commendation on the pages of his diary. “As a
composition, it is splendid,” he wrote, “and will take its place in the
archives of our country, and dwell in the memory of our citizens
alongside of the Farewell Address.... I think Jackson’s election may
save the Union. If he is sincere in his Proclamation, he will put down
this rebellion. Mr. Clay, pursuing the same measures, would not have
been equally successful.”[561] We have seen, in Jackson’s letter to
Hamilton, his desire that every agency of publicity should be employed
to focus the sentiment against Nullification. The New York Legislature
being then in session, Hamilton wrote leading men in Albany urging the
passage of a commendatory resolution. In the absence of definite
encouragement, he then wrote Van Buren, his political and personal
friend, suggesting that he bring pressure to bear upon his friends in
the Assembly. The letter was returned, opened, but unanswered, and
Hamilton lost no time in writing of the incident to Jackson, with the
comment that “this unfriendly, nay offensive course, resulted from Van
Buren’s fear of offending the dominant political party in
Virginia.”[562]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account