The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
Thus did Clayton contribute to the pleasure of the Nullifiers by the
denunciation of the man who stood in their way, and in sneering at those
Southern Democrats who stood squarely behind Jackson despite the gibes
of the Calhoun followers that they were yielding a servile submission.
Meanwhile Jackson’s supporters were giving the measure their undivided
support, and none of them more heartily, and none so ably, as Senators
from the South. Senator Felix Grundy of Tennessee, able lawyer, seasoned
statesman, resourceful parliamentarian, took charge of the fight on the
floor. Rives of Virginia, learned constitutional lawyer, scholarly,
polished, heroically sacrificed a seat in the Senate to stand by the
Union. And Forsyth of Georgia, “the greatest debater of his time,”
affected to look upon the Nullification doctrine as “the double
distilled essence of nonsense.”
As the fight developed and the certainty of defeat grew upon the
Nullifiers, efforts were made to gain time, with the Administration
forces pressing for action. Senator Willie Mangum of North Carolina,
brilliant, and sacrificing a great career to drink, on securing the
floor asked for an adjournment on the ground of indisposition.
Ordinarily the request would have been granted. But Forsyth, Grundy, and
Wilkins were instantly on their feet with objections. Calhoun, pointing
out that Mangum was the only member of the Judiciary Committee opposed
to the bill, begged that he be given an opportunity to explain his
position, only to be told, none too graciously, by Wilkins, that he had
no doubt of Mangum’s capacity to speak then. When Calhoun reminded him
of Mangum’s plea of indisposition, he was ignored. At this juncture,
Webster, who had been silent, suggested that Mangum could easily speak
on another day and the debate proceed. Whereupon Senator King of Alabama
made a transparent effort to draw Webster’s speech at once. The New
England orator significantly replied that “the gentleman from
Massachusetts fully understands the gentleman from Alabama; but he has
no disposition to address the Senate at present, nor, under existing
circumstances, at any other time, on the subject of this bill.” This was
taken as indicating Webster’s conviction that up to that time the
advocates of the bill needed no reënforcements, and that he would
reserve himself for Calhoun.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account