The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
But the desperate Opposition, hard pressed, and requiring encouragement
for its followers, succeeded, through exaggerations and red fire, in
convincing the rank and file that an anti-Jackson wave had swept the
Nation. Rhode Island, never a Jackson State, went against the Democrats,
and this was celebrated with as much enthusiasm as though a stronghold
of the enemy had been taken. The triumph of the Whigs in the
Philadelphia ward elections was exploited as a signal triumph. Virginia,
anti-Bank as well as anti-Jackson, was lost to the Democrats, and the
Opposition interpreted it as a pro-Bank as well as an anti-Jackson
verdict. In Louisiana the Whigs won on the tariff, but the impression
was given that the result reflected a popular resentment of the
mistreatment of Nicholas Biddle. As a matter of fact, no intelligent
politician could have attached any particular significance to the
results of the spring elections, and the leaders immediately began
their preparations for the congressional elections in the fall.
II
In these elections the Opposition to Jacksonian Democracy was to fight
for the first time under its new party name. In February, 1834, James
Watson Webb, the unscrupulous speculator in Bank stock, and editor of
the “Courier and Enquirer” of New York City, had proposed that the
combination against the policies of Jackson should be known as the Whig
Party. “It is a glorious name,” said John Forsyth, “and I have no doubt
they will disgrace it.” Within six months the National Republicans and
the Anti-Masons disappeared--united under the Whig banner. In September,
1834, Niles records, in his “Register,” that, “as if by universal
consent, all parties opposed to the present Administration call
themselves Whigs.” And all who called themselves Whigs denounced the
Jacksonians as Tories. It was a pretty conceit. The Whigs of England had
fought the battles of the people against the usurpations of the throne,
and the Whigs of America were fighting the usurpations of Jackson. The
Constitution against anarchy, the people against the Power--such was the
fight of Nicholas Biddle, Henry Clay, and John C. Calhoun against
Jackson.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account