The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
Thus, with affairs in Washington in capable hands, with victory in the
Bank fight on his side, with the delights of the Hermitage just beyond,
the iron man set forth in high spirits and with no regrets or fears. The
Biddle threat of more “discipline” for the people during the summer and
autumn, because of the failure of Congress to recharter the Bank, had
not disturbed him so much as it had alarmed the Whigs. Those in Boston
met the threat with a counter-threat of denunciation, and those in New
York warned Biddle that more distress would certainly prove disastrous
to the Whigs in the fall elections. Biddle deeply resented the criticism
of the Whigs, who, under the leadership of Clay, had practically
blackmailed him into using the Bank’s power against the Democrats. When
those of Boston warned that more discipline of the people might “even
create a necessity for the Whigs, in self-defense, to separate
themselves entirely” from his institution, he wrote in defiant mood to
the president of his Boston branch that “if ... any political party or
association desires to separate itself from the Bank--be it so.” He had
not read the letter to the board of directors lest the members favorable
to the Democrats might use it to the disadvantage of the Whigs.[762] But
he was to find that his frown had lost its force. Another Whig from New
York wrote of much dissatisfaction in that city and State among the
Bank’s friends and “those of influence in the Whig Party--and sure I am
that it is increasing every day.” The feeling was prevalent, encouraged
by the views of Albert Gallatin, that the Bank could have relieved the
distress had it so desired. And Alexander Hamilton, the brother of
Jackson’s friend, and son of the father of the National Bank, wrote a
little later to a correspondent that “it has been found expedient to
abandon the Bank in our political pilgrimage.” He found that “the people
are now familiarly acquainted with the immense power of a national bank
and apprehend all kinds of terrible consequences from its
exercise.”[763] Thus, instead of more “discipline,” the Bank found it
possible to take steps, which, according to Catterall, justified
Jackson, the following December, in saying in his Message that “the Bank
... announced its ability and readiness to abandon the system of
unparalleled curtailment ... and to extend its accommodations to the
community.”
Just, as in 1832, when floating down the Ohio on his last visit to the
Hermitage during the presidential campaign, Andrew Jackson was at peace
with himself and the world. But his friends had given orders to take
nothing for granted and to open the fighting along the whole line. They
had a twofold purpose--to hold the line in Congress, and to defeat,
wherever possible, any senatorial enemies who were candidates for
reëlection. Blair, of the “Globe,” began to issue special editions and
to send them broadcast all over the country.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account