The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
The Whig leaders entered upon the congressional session of December in a
bitter mood. Calhoun was especially vicious and in a chronic rage
against the President and the Administration. The fury of the Whigs was
not moderated by the fact that State Legislatures were beginning to
demand the expunging from the records of the resolution of censure.
Benton, in the previous session, had served notice of his intention to
move to expunge, and the Kitchen Cabinet in the meanwhile had been busy
in building backfires against the offending Senators among their
constituents. The first State to act was Alabama. The day before Senator
King presented the Alabama resolutions, during a running discussion of
the revelations of mismanagement and crookedness in the Post-Office
Department, Senator Preston suggested that the Senate should censure
some one. Just whom he would censure was not made clear, but he did
refer to the previous declaration of Jackson that he was responsible for
the Executive departments. “Does any one doubt the turpitude of the
Post-Office?” asked Preston. “When hardly the age of man, it is found
steeped in corruption the most foul, the most melancholy. If the
President is responsible, and the officers acted improperly, is this the
house to present the subject? And shall we stand by without saying or
doing anything in regard to the present state of things in that
department?”
Calhoun was instantly on his feet. He had listened to the report on the
Post-Office “with sorrow and deep mortification.” After twenty-two years
of connection with the Government he was able to say that “in all that
time the charges of corruption against all the departments of the
Government that he had ever heard of were not equal to the disclosures
here made.” In truth he thought that “the exhibition would disgrace the
rottenest age of the Roman Republic.” He hoped some resolution would be
presented.
This implied threat was not lost on the ever alert Benton, and on the
following day he took the floor, reminded the Senate of his promise,
declared that nothing less than the expurgation of the offensive censure
would suffice, and served notice of his intention to present the
resolution. This opened the first debate on expurgation. Clay, with a
personal fling at Benton, saltily expressed the hope that before acting
the Missourian would carefully examine the Constitution, and concluded
that he would “oppose such a resolution at the very threshold.” Preston
conceded that his party had been “beaten down,” and demanded to know
whether “everything that we have done shall be expunged.” Calhoun would
“like to see a resolution which proposed to repeal the journal--to
repeal a fact.” If the thing could be done, “the Senate itself could be
expunged,” and the Government itself was at an end. He was “anxious to
see who would attempt to carry out the doctrines of the Protest of last
year--doctrines as despotic as those which were held by the autocrat of
all the Russias.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account