The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
The definite break between Calhoun and Jackson was one of the most
dramatic and far-reaching in its political effects of any similar
quarrel in American history. It furnished Clay with new material for the
building of his party. It decisively committed the party of Jackson to
the defense of the Union. It eliminated Calhoun from the list of
presidential possibilities, dropped the curtain on the South Carolinian
that the Nation had known for two decades, and raised it on another with
whom the world is well acquainted. It divided his life into two distinct
parts. It made Martin Van Buren President.
The Calhoun who was to become one of Clay’s most vituperative and
intemperate lieutenants in the fight against the Administration differs
as radically from the ambitious politician who had intrigued for the
election of Jackson as the Webster of the Great Debate differed from the
Webster of the Rockingham Resolutions.
The greatest biographer of the Carolinian[228] fixes the time that he
became the personification of the slavery cause as 1830--the date of the
quarrel--and says that “up to that time he is, in spite of his
uncommonly brilliant career, only an able politician of the higher and
nobler order, having many peers and even a considerable number of
superiors.” Of the three great figures, Clay, Webster, and Calhoun, he
was admittedly the strongest intellectually, and the one most
unmistakably touched with genius. Nature made him a statesman. Swept
into Congress on the wave of patriotic enthusiasm following the attack
on the Chesapeake, his audacity, independent thinking, militancy, and
genius combined to place him in the very lead of the party of Young
America that clamored for the War of 1812. He sounded the first clear
official war note in his report on that part of Madison’s Message
dealing with our relations with England; and after the delivery of his
first war speech one of the leading editors of the day hailed “this
young Carolinian as one of the master spirits who stamp their names upon
the age in which they live.”[229] In his haughty assumption of equality
with the oldest and most experienced members of the Congress, he
suggests the younger Pitt. His war speeches were classics of
argumentation, sober, and yet pulsating with patriotic passion. If any
sectional thought crossed his mind then, it never touched his tongue. He
was a superb Nationalist--one of the most splendid figures of his time.
Summoned into Monroe’s Cabinet as Secretary of War, he disclosed a high
order of executive as well as legislative ability. Finding the
department in confusion, he brought order out of chaos, and established
system. A former officer of the great Napoleon was impressed with the
resemblance between Calhoun’s plan of army organization and that of the
Corsican.[230] Even his friends were agreeably astonished at his
aptitude for organzation and general executive duties. And this
furthered his presidential plans, and a strong party in the Congress
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account