The unofficials threatened if Chetty were proposed to overwhelm him
with black-balls, and so his name had to be withdrawn. I may say I do
not think his nominal admission as a member would have made much
difference. Merely allowing a man to enter a club does not admit him
to the intimacy of the Club, and that alone counts. However, Chetty
was refused admittance at all.
There were, of course, other troubles. An Indian who has entered the
Civil Service is really in an impossible position. Socially he belongs
to no world. He has left his own and cannot enter the other. And you
cannot divorce social life from official life. They are not two
things, but one. In the end Chetty shot himself. It was a sad end for
a man gifted and likeable.
And although such an end was unusual, the causes which led to it are
universal. I have known several civilians who were Indians, and, as I
said before, I think they were all unhappy. They felt that fate had
put them in an impossible position. If they married their
fellow-country-women they by this act divorced themselves still further
from European society; if they married an Englishwoman they did no
better; the other Englishwomen would not receive her, and inherent
differences of civilisation rendered married life difficult. I think
that if individuals realised what their ambition would lead to they
would choose any other walk in life than to enter an alien service.
Their ideals are wrong. It is no true ideal for an Indian or Burmese
to wish to be an Englishman. Fate has allotted to him a different
field of usefulness quite as great in its way. An Indian gentleman may
be quite as true a gentleman as an English gentleman and be not in the
least like him. By blind imitation they attempt to attain virtues not
inherent in them, and they ignore other virtues which are inherent and
necessary to the world. They seek after impossibilities and so
negative the achievement of possibilities. They deny their own natures.
It may be that this desire of Indians to enter the Civil Service has
arisen from the desire to begin local self-government--a proper
ambition. But the end cannot be attained in this way. Like all other
edifices, local self-government is built up from below. It is built on
its own foundation. You cannot begin replacing an edifice by removing
the top or middle stones and replacing them with others.
Self-government is not to be attained by gradually altering the roof.
Therefore the claim that they would influence Government is untenable.
Government must do its work in its own way, and that is the English
way. No Indian can tell what this is.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account