The passing of the great race; or, The racial basis of European historyGrant, Madison
History
The passing of the great race; or, The racial basis of European history
Grant, Madison
Ethnology -- Europe
The Sacæ and Massagetæ were, like the Persians, tall, blond dolichocephs
and they have left behind them dim traces of their blood among the
living Mongolized nomads of Turkestan, the Kirghizes. Ancient Bactria
maintained its Nordic and Aryan aspect long after Alexander’s time and
did not become Mongolized and receive the sinister name of Turkestan
until the seventh century, when it was the first victim of the series of
ferocious invasions from the north and east, which under various Mongol
leaders destroyed civilization in Asia and threatened its existence in
Europe. These conquests culminated in 1241 A. D. at Wahlstatt in Silesia
where the Germans, though themselves badly defeated, put a final limit
to this westward rush of Asiatics.
The Sacæ were the most easterly members of the Nordic race of whom we
have definite record. The Chinese knew well these “green eyed devils,”
whom they called by their Tatar name, the “Wu-suns,”—the tall ones—and
with whom they came into contact about 200 B. C. in what is now Chinese
Turkestan. Other Nordic tribes are recorded in this region. Evidence is
accumulating that central Asia had a large Nordic population in the
centuries preceding the Christian era. The discovery of the Aryan
Tokharian language in Chinese Turkestan considered in connection with
other facts indicates intensive occupation by Nordics of territories in
central Asia now wholly Mongol, just as in Europe dark-haired Alpines
occupy large territories where in Roman times fair-haired Nordics were
preponderant. In short we find both in Europe and in western and central
Asia the same record of Nordic decline during the last two thousand
years and their replacement by races of inferior value and civilization.
This Tokharian is undoubtedly a pure Aryan language related, curiously
enough, to the western group rather than to the Indo-Iranian. It has
been deciphered from inscriptions recently found in northeast Turkestan
and was a living language prior to the ninth century A. D.
Of all the wonderful conquests of the Sacæ there remain as evidence of
their invasions only these Indian and Afghan languages. Dim traces of
their blood have been found in the Pamirs and in Afghanistan, but in the
south their blond traits have vanished, even from the Punjab. It may be
that the stature of some of the Afghan hill tribes and of the Sikhs and
some of the facial characters of the latter are derived from this
source, but all blondness of skin, hair or eye of the original Sacæ has
utterly vanished.
The long skulls all through India are to be attributed to the
Mediterranean race rather than to this Nordic invasion, while the
Pre-Dravidians and Negroids of south India, with which the former are
largely mixed, are also dolichocephs.
In short, the introduction in Iran and India of Aryan languages,
Iranian, Ghalchic and Sanskrit, represents a linguistic and not an
ethnic conquest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account