The passing of the great race; or, The racial basis of European historyGrant, Madison
History
The passing of the great race; or, The racial basis of European history
Grant, Madison
Ethnology -- Europe
“The theory has been abandoned that this was an autochthonous
development, typical of the Indo-Europeans [Nordics] before they
differentiated (_cf._ Chvojka, the first discoverer). Although similar
to Ægean art this was earlier (see Von Stern, _Prehistoric Greek Culture
in the South of Russia_). It came suddenly to an end and had no
successor in that region. The people were agriculturalists long before
the Scythians, but the next people who lived there were thorough nomads.
Niederle (_Slav. Ant._, I) dates them 2000 B. C. The Tripolje people
either moved south or were overwhelmed by new comers.” As Peake says, 2,
pp. 164–165, here was a very likely point of contact between the Nordic
and Alpine stocks, a mixture which, in the opinion of the author, may
ultimately throw some light on the origin of the Dinaric and Beaker
Maker types. Through this region both Alpines and Nordics must have
passed many times in their wanderings. Here perhaps the Alpines became
partly Nordicized, especially as to their language.
143 : 21. Sarmatians. There has been considerable confusion over these
people, owing to the various ways in which the name has been spelled by
early and later writers, and to the fact that they dwelt in the region
where both Alpines and Nordics must have existed side by side. The name
Sarmatians has been applied at one time to Nordics, at another to
Alpines or even Mongolians, depending on the dates when they were
discussed and the bias of various writers. We have no generic name for
the Alpine peoples who must have been in this region in early times,
except that of Sarmatians or Scythians. As the Scythians are apparently
strongly Nordic in character, the name Sarmatians seemed more fitting to
apply to the Alpine tribes who were certainly there. Not all authorities
are agreed as to their affiliations, however, as has been said.
Jordanes declares that the Sarmatians and the Sauromatæ were the same
people. Stephanus Byzantius states that the Syrmatæ were identical with
the Sauromatæ. They are first mentioned by Polybius as being in Europe
in 179 B. C. (XXV, II; XXVI, VI, 12). But in Asia we hear of them as
early as 325 B. C., according to Minns, p. 38, who says that they
gradually shifted westward, until in 50 A. D. they were in the Danube
valley. Jordanes later speaks of the Carpathian mountains as the
Sarmatian range. Mierow, in the notes to his translation of Jordanes,
makes the Sarmatians a great Slavic people dwelling from the Vistula to
the Don, in what is now Poland and Russia. (See also Hodgkin, _Italy_,
vol. I, part I, p. 71.) According to Jordanes, the Sarmatians were
beyond Dacia (the ancient Gothic land) and to the north (XII, 74). It is
with these statements in mind that the author has designated them as
Alpines.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account