The Path, Vol. I.—1886-'7.: A Magazine Devoted to the Brotherhood of Humanity, Theosophy in America, and the Study of Occult Science, Philosophy, and Aryan Literature.Various
Religion
The Path, Vol. I.—1886-'7.: A Magazine Devoted to the Brotherhood of Humanity, Theosophy in America, and the Study of Occult Science, Philosophy, and Aryan Literature.
Various
Theosophy -- Periodicals
Of course there was a field of Jewish Cabbalistic literature,—not
open, but confined, for the most part, as a kind of sacred mystery,
within narrow and restricted limits, even among the Jews themselves.
It was of the same nature with what is called, to-day, The Speculative
Philosophy of Free Masonry, an ever seemingly substantive embodiment
out of surrounding shadowy mists and mental fogs, wherein a doubt
always exists whether after all there is in the nebulous matter of the
mist itself anything from whence substance may congeal; or, it may,
for illustration, be compared to the city of King Arthur, before whose
gate Gareth, standing, says: “But these my men—(your city moves so
weirdly in the mist),—doubt if the King be King at all, or come from
Fairy land: and whether this be built by magic, and by fairy kings and
queens, or whether there be any city at all, or all a vision.” It is
necessary to make a brief mention of this literature with its sources;
both that these may be known, and that a foundation may be laid for
what is stated as to the reality of Cabbalah, and its significance.
There is almost no teaching of the Cabbalah in the English language
except the Essay by Christian D. Ginsburg, LL. D., to which we have
referred. Dr. Ginsburg says: “It is a system of religious philosophy,
or more properly, of theosophy, which has not only exercised for
hundreds of years an extraordinary influence on the mental development
of so shrewd a people as the Jews, but has captivated the minds of
some of the greatest thinkers of Christendom in the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries, and which claims the greatest attention of both
the philosopher and theologian.”
It is faintly claimed that some statements applying to Cabbalah are to
be found in the Talmud; but apart from this we have:—(1) The Commentary
on the Ten Sephiroth, by R. Azariel ben Manachem (1160-1238), who was
a pupil of Isaac the Blind, and master of the celebrated R. Moses
Nachmanides, (2) The Book Sohar (Light), or Midrash, Let there be
Light, claimed to have been a revelation from God, communicated through
R. Simon ben Jochai, A. D. 70-110, to his select disciples. This book
has been pronounced by the ablest critics to have been a pseudograph
of the thirteenth century,—the composition of Moses de Leon, who lived
in Spain; who, by the admission of his wife and daughter after his
death, first published and sold it as the production of R. Simon ben
Jochai, and (3) The Book Jetzirah or Book of Creation,—of unknown age
and authorship, but mentioned as early as the eleventh century in the
Book Chazari, by R. Jehudah Ha Levi,—as the literary sources for the
entire system and scope thereof, so far as disclosed. It is from these
sources that the entire volume of Cabbalistic literature has had rise
and development.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account