The pathology of influenzaWinternitz, M. C. (Milton C.)
Science
The pathology of influenza
Winternitz, M. C. (Milton C.)
Influenza
Various observers have emphasized the types of organism associated with
different gross and microscopic manifestations of influenzal pneumonia.
Pfeiffer described the peribronchial type with purulent bronchitis, from
which the influenza bacillus was isolated, and the same association has
been noted by MacCallum (92), Wolbach (162), Wegelin (156), Dietrich
(34), and others. Opie et al (110), however, in a series from which B.
influenzæ was isolated in over eighty-five per cent of the necropsies
rarely found this picture. Wolbach states that the gross anatomical
picture in influenzal pneumonia is similar to that following measles,
from which a hemolytic streptococcus has been isolated in a high
percentage of cases. MacCallum (93) classified this type as interstitial
pneumonia. It is interesting to note that interstitial pneumonia has
been rare in many localities where the hemolytic streptococcus has been
prevalent during the past year. Stone and Swift (138) state that
“despite the prevalence of the streptococcus at necropsy, only eight
instances of so-called interstitial pneumonia were found in a series of
fifty-five cases,” and Goodpasture (48) failed to find a single example
in a series of sixteen cases. The pneumococci Types I and II, frequently
encountered in the usual forms of lobar pneumonia, have been found
exceptionally in this epidemic. Type II, however, has been reported (67,
107) present in about the same proportion as in true lobar pneumonia
(5). Chickering and Park (25) described a series of cases of pneumonia
due to the staphylococcus characterized by multiple miliary abscesses.
Necrotization and abscess formation, however, have been striking
features of the pathology of this epidemic, even when the staphylococcus
has not been demonstrable. Recently Wadsworth (154) demonstrated
experimentally that organization in pneumonia does not result from the
pneumococcus or the staphylococcus alone, but only follows when both
organisms are associated. On the contrary, Blanton and Irons (12) found
that “there was no difference to be made out in the nature of the
process caused by the streptococcus, pneumococcus, or influenza
bacillus.”
[Illustration:
FIG. XLVII. AUTOPSY NO. 100. PROLIFERATION OF THE ALVEOLAR EPITHELIUM
IN A PORTION OF THE LUNG ONLY SLIGHTLY INVOLVED BY THE ACUTE
INFLAMMATORY PROCESS. COMPARE FIGURES IV, XI, XLVIII, AND XLIX.
HELIOTYPE CO. BOSTON
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account