“viridans,” Pneumococcus │ │ IV and staphylococci │ 0│ 1 Pneumococcus Type II │ 0│ 4 Pneumococcus Type III │ 0│ 5 Pneumococcus Type IV │ 0│ 4 Pneumococcus (Type undetermined) │ 0│ 6 Pneumococcus Type II and B. │ │ influenzæ │ 1 1│ 2 Pneumococcus Type II and B. │ │ mucosus capsulatus │ 0│ 1 Pneumococcus Type II and │ │ staphylococci │ 0│ 1 Pneumococcus Type III and B. │ │ influenzæ │ 0│ 1 Pneumococcus Type III and │ │ staphylococci │ 1 1│ 1 Pneumococcus Type IV and B. │ │ influenzæ │ 0│ 8 Staphylococci │ 1 1│ 1 Staphylococci and B. influenzæ │ 0│ 1 Staphylococci, B. influenzæ and │ │ M. catarrhalis │ 0│ 1 B. influenzæ and Pneumococcus │ │ (Type undetermined) │ 0│ 2 B. influenzæ and a pleomorphic │ │ diplococcus │ 0│ 1 Enterococcus │ 0│ 1 ═════════════════════════════════╧═══════════════════════════════╧═════ The type of the pneumonic process, as well as the invading organism, has varied widely in different localities. From the foregoing brief survey, it will be seen that before the associations suggested above can be proven, much more definite evidence must be presented. An attempt has been made to correlate the bacteriological findings in this series with the distribution and type of pneumonic process. These are tabulated in Table III. It will be seen at a glance that no relationship is demonstrable between the type of single or associated organisms and the distribution of the pneumonia, whether it is lobar, pseudolobar, peribronchial or lobular and whether acute fulminating, necrotizing or organizing. (See Table No. III.) D. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION