Flower-buds tender, medium to small, short, conical or pointed,
plump, pubescent, free; blossoms appear in mid-season; flowers
a faded pink, white at the center of the petals, about
three-fourths inch across; pedicels short, medium to thick,
glabrous, green; calyx-tube reddish-green; calyx-lobes short,
broad, obtuse, glabrous within, pubescent without; petals
roundish-oval, tapering to short, broad claws occasionally with
a red base; filaments one-fourth inch long, shorter than the
petals; pistil pubescent near the base, longer than the stamens.
Fruit matures very late; two and one-eighth inches long,
two and one-fourth inches wide, round-oval, compressed and
somewhat angular, with unequal sides; cavity variable in
depth and width, abrupt or flaring; suture shallow, extending
beyond the apex; apex ending in a swollen, pointed tip; color
creamy-white, blushed with red, splashed and mottled with
darker red; pubescence short, thick, fine; skin thin, adhering
to the pulp; flesh white, juicy, firm and meaty but tender,
sweet or somewhat sprightly; good in quality; stone clinging,
one and one-fourth inches long, seven-eighths inch wide, oval,
plump, flattened and pointed toward the base, tapering to a
short point at the apex, with dark brown, grooved surfaces;
ventral suture deep along the sides, thick, furrowed; dorsal
suture grooved.
HEATH FREE
=1.= _Am. Pom. Soc. Cat._ 37. 1909. =2.= Waugh _Am. Peach
Orch._ 203. 1913.
_Kenrick Heath._ =3.= Prince _Treat. Hort._ 17. 1828. =4.=
Prince _Pom. Man._ =2=:30, 31. 1832. =5.= Downing _Fr. Trees
Am._ 479. 1845. =6.= _Am. Pom. Soc. Cat._ 78. 1862. =7.=
Budd-Hansen _Am. Hort. Man._ =2=:348. 1903.
_Heath._ =8.= Kenrick _Am. Orch._ 226, 227. 1832.
Heath Free is now rarely planted, being replaced by better sorts--in
fact it was out of date a quarter-century ago when the American
Pomological Society dropped it from its fruit-list. We can see no
justification of the Society's action in restoring the variety to its
list ten years later. The tree-characters of Heath Free seem to be,
in the main, very good but the peaches are not at all attractive in
appearance and none too good in quality--at best it is but a culinary
sort. Possibly it is worth growing under some conditions as a late,
white-fleshed peach.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account