The oldest notion is that the production of a nectarine on a peach-tree
is due to the direct action of pollen from some nearby nectarine-tree
on the ovary of the peach. This theory, wholly at variance with
present knowledge, is also discredited by the many instances in which
the sports occur when the two fruits are not growing in the same
neighborhood or even region. Thus, within ten years, several cases
of nectarines on peach-trees have occurred in this State where the
nectarine is scarcely known. Besides, crossing these fruits shows no
direct effect of pollen--as is true with nearly all other plants. Still
further, when a branch of a peach has borne a nectarine it usually goes
on year after year producing nectarines; and certainly impregnation of
a flower by foreign pollen could not so profoundly modify a branch.
There is so little foundation for this belief that it would not be
mentioned were it not that many fruit-growers still look to the action
of pollen as the explanation of the phenomenon.
Another, and a much more probable explanation, is that every sporting
peach or nectarine-tree is a more or less remote hybrid. There is a
growing belief that species are fixed and that crossing is the only
source of new seed- or bud-forms. Certainly all who have crossed
plants in any considerable numbers know that hybridity is at least one
cause, and a frequent one, of mutations. It is possible that sometime
in the past the peach and the nectarine were crossed, the offspring
showing no trace of the cross, and that now there is an occasional
disassociation of the characters brought together by such crossing.
There are several objections to this hypothesis. One is that two forms
sufficiently distinct to induce so striking a variation as a nectarine
from a peach, must have differed in tree as well as in fruit-characters
and that these differences would crop out just as smoothness of fruit
so frequently does. Another, and less potent objection, is that the
nectarine has never been found wild, that it never becomes naturalized,
that it is shorter-lived and less vigorous and behaves in general like
an artificial plant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account