Of the nine leading American pomological writers of the Nineteenth
Century, Coxe, Prince, Cole, Hooper, Elliott and Barry either do
not attempt to classify or make but one or two simple divisions.
Kenrick, 1832, follows Lindley in part but makes use of season in his
classification. Downing in his first edition, 1845, divides peaches
into freestones with pale flesh, freestones with deep yellow flesh and
clingstones. This simple arrangement by Downing is notable only because
it is the first time color of flesh is made use of as a distinguishing
mark, the Europeans probably not having done so because yellow-fleshed
varieties are rare in Europe whereas in America they are as common or
more so than white-fleshed sorts. Thomas, in 1846, did not classify
but in later editions divided peaches into two divisions, founded
on adherence of flesh to the stone; two classes for each division
in accordance with color of flesh; and three sections founded on
leaf-serrations and glands.
These Nineteenth Century classifications are artificial. That is, they
single out a few points of resemblance and difference and arrange
varieties in accordance with them, convenience and facility of use
being the controlling principles. They are natural to a degree,
however, because varieties agreeing in one point of structure commonly
agree in other characters. With the peach, more than in the artificial
classification of most other fruits, the characters are readily
distinguished and are stable. Yet most English pomologies now arrange
varieties of peaches alphabetically, while the American texts do the
same or use the pseudo-natural system of Onderdonk. His classification
we are about to discuss. The early artificial arrangements failed to
stand the test of time because classifiers could not agree upon any
one arrangement and added confusion by the multiplicity of them; and,
because the new varieties of the last half-century, coming in great
numbers, are so poorly described that the great majority of them could
not be classified from the data at hand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account