If the spread of the rural Franks and of the Anglo-Saxons into
the erstwhile Roman domains led to the submergence of the old
cities and to much village foundation, there is at any rate a
growing opinion that it did not destroy all continuity in either Gaul
or Britain, that a good deal in our rural life goes back, as above
hinted, to the late Bronze Age. The system of the manor under
which the villagers give service to a military protector is too easily
mixed up with the village system in discussions. The manor,
with complex origins, is characteristic of post-Roman days
of movement and strife. The civilizing element promoting
agriculture and the law is furnished by the Church, which, with
the centuries, spread its work over the Rhine, beyond the bounds
of the Empire, right away to the limits of Europe-of-the-Sea,
that is of the lands near Baltic or Mediterranean, or west of a
north-south line near the east ends of those seas.
With the settling down which heralded the Middle Ages after
the Dark Centuries of movement and war, we thus find the
following broad facts. In the Mediterranean, where fruit culture
and the city-state and trade were already old, that type of life
reasserted itself even though the division of life on the north and
the south sides (characteristic long before in Phoenician times)
of the sea made grave difficulties.
In Spain the conflict between Islam and Christians inhibited the
development of both and delayed everything. In both cases the
military organization was unhealthily important, and the Muslim
of the south kept much of their old social scheme based on the
tribe, whereas they should have been adapting themselves to the rich
land of Andalusia which they held. The result of the inhibitions
made the Muslim far more of a misfit in the Andalusian garden
than were the Christians on the heights of northern Spain, where
seasonal movement of flocks and herds (_transhumance_) is still
{95}
very important. The Muslim of the south thus gradually declined
both in value and in influence, and though in earlier times they
had been far more cultured than their Christian foemen, they had
dropped far behind in organization before their subjugation in
the fifteenth century. One should nevertheless bear in mind
possible valuable survivals from the Muslim in matters of detail
or of individual work. In Gaul cultivation had spread and had
improved under monastic leadership; markets were growing
under protection of the cathedrals, and were becoming the
town centres that have persisted as the highly characteristic
market towns of the Paris basin. After years of rivalry with
Frankish dialects the old Roman heritage of language triumphed
with some compromises, and became the _langue d'oïl_, the speech of
the Paris basin and upper Burgundy, and the progenitor of standard
modern French. In Britain the rural element seems to have
predominated until Gaulish influences again became strong in the
eleventh century.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account