The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898, Volume 36, 1649-1666: Explorations by early navigators, descriptions of the islands and their peoples, their history and records of the Catholic missions, as related in contemporaneous books and manuscripts, showing the political, economic, commercial and religious conditions of those islands from their earliest relations with European nations to the close of the nineteenth century.
History
The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898, Volume 36, 1649-1666: Explorations by early navigators, descriptions of the islands and their peoples, their history and records of the Catholic missions, as related in contemporaneous books and manuscripts, showing the political, economic, commercial and religious conditions of those islands from their earliest relations with European nations to the close of the nineteenth century.
Demarcation line of Alexander VI; Missions -- Philippines; Philippines -- Discovery and exploration; Philippines -- History -- Sources
[19] In the MS. this latter clause is separated from the preceding one,
but obviously refers to it. The argument of Solana is: The Dominican
school requires the teachings of St. Thomas, "the Angelical Doctor,"
to be maintained. But St. Thomas opposed the belief and doctrine of
the immaculate conception of the blessed Virgin Mary. In Solana's day
the dogma of the immaculate conception had not yet been defined by the
Church; it then was a moot question. But in that day the belief in and
teaching of the immaculate conception was common, though not (as said)
of duty--Dominicans only, one may say, holding to the contrary. The
pupils, then, of Santo Tomas had to swear to uphold what was not common
belief, although it was not then heretical.--Rev. T. C. Middleton,
O.S.A.
[20] Many passages in this document are very involved and elliptical,
and in some places the sense is not at all clear. The translation
is necessarily somewhat free, at times, in wording; but it is
believed that the author's meaning is, as a rule, accurately
rendered.--Rev. T. C. Middleton, O. S. A.
[21] This description of the Philippines appears in a manuscript
book of an itinerary of the district of the Inquisition of Mexico,
made by the order of the bishop of Plasencia, Diego de Arce Reynoso, a
member of his Majesty's Council and inquisitor-general of his kingdoms
and seigniories, and given to Pedro de Medina Rico, visitor of the
Inquisition of the City of Mexico and its districts. The Philippines
have place in this itinerary, as they were under the Inquisition
of Mexico. This general visit or itinerary was to include a general
review of all things affecting the Inquisition, its establishments
and employees.
[22] That is, along the bay shore in the other direction--northward
from the city of Manila.
[23] This is a misstatement, for the three islands of Samar, Negros,
and Panay are larger than Paragua, the areas of the four islands in
square miles being respectively, 5,031, 4,881, 4,611, and 4,027. See
Census of Philippine Islands, ii, p. 30.
[24] The island of Cebú has an area of 1,762 square miles; Bohol,
1,441; 2,722; 5,031; Samar, 5,031; Negros, 4,881; Bantayan (the
Bantallan of the text), 47; Panai, 4,611; Mindanao, 36,292. See Census
of Philippine Islands, ii, p. 30.
[25] Bachian, not Ternate, is the largest of the Moluccas, its area
being 800 square geographical miles, while that of Ternate is only
11.5. See Crawfurd's Dictionary.
[26] The following two sections are taken from the Historia de los
religiosos descalzos (Madrid, 1681) of Luis de Jesús, pp. 371-373.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account