The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898, Volume 36, 1649-1666: Explorations by early navigators, descriptions of the islands and their peoples, their history and records of the Catholic missions, as related in contemporaneous books and manuscripts, showing the political, economic, commercial and religious conditions of those islands from their earliest relations with European nations to the close of the nineteenth century.
History
The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898, Volume 36, 1649-1666: Explorations by early navigators, descriptions of the islands and their peoples, their history and records of the Catholic missions, as related in contemporaneous books and manuscripts, showing the political, economic, commercial and religious conditions of those islands from their earliest relations with European nations to the close of the nineteenth century.
Demarcation line of Alexander VI; Missions -- Philippines; Philippines -- Discovery and exploration; Philippines -- History -- Sources
This is not fancy,
for that has happened in like case in Manila. That is the greatest
danger since, because of the great distance, redress moves with
very dilatory steps. But in the meanwhile the suits concerning the
religious are proceeding from tribunal to tribunal, contrary to the
clearly expressed privileges of his exemption.
731. But let us suppose that the regular parish priest is unworthy
to persevere in his mission because of secret sins, and that, even
if he remain in it, he may run some risk of his salvation. The
provincial learns of the matter secretly. In such a case, justice
requires two things--one, the punishment of the guilty person; and
the other, that the delinquent shall not lose his reputation by the
declaration of his fault. Charity urges him to remove his subordinate
from danger. If that regular administers without canonical institution
and subjection to the ordinary, everything will be settled very easily,
and justice and charity will be satisfied without any infamy to the
criminal or any dishonor to the order. But if he is subject to the
ordinary, the provincial cannot remove him by his own authority; but
he must have recourse to the ordinary himself, and to the vice-patron,
and then those two agree on the removal. In that case, what can the
provincial say to them? If he should say that he will impart to them
in all secrecy the [nature of the] crime of his subject, that means
is harsh and less safe. The ordinary and the governor, as the father
and the master, may correct and punish the faults of their inferiors
without the least wound to their honor; and must a provincial do so by
dis-accrediting his subordinate with the heads of the community? If
it is decided that the superior do not tell the kind of crime, but
that he asseverate in general terms that there is cause to remove the
religious from that place, the trouble is not avoided. First, they may
think that he speaks thus in order to go ahead with his oldtime custom;
second, because even though the cause of removing him be not a fault,
it can easily be alleged to be one, and the fact that he does not offer
more explanation in that case comes to be the same as manifesting
its gravity by his silence. Finally, honor is very delicate and is
lessened by rumor and suspicion. Since God made the religious exempt
from the secular judges, and the apostolic see exempted them from
the ordinaries, the religious, when they have not professed as curas,
will find themselves without courage to assume that charge with so many
dangers and burdens. And will the apostolic see force them to that?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account