The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898; Volume 50: Explorations by early navigators, descriptions of the islands and their peoples, their history and records of the catholic missions, as related in contemporaneous books and manuscripts, showing the political, economic, commercial and religious conditions of those islands from their earliest relations with European nations to the close of the nineteenth century
History
The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898; Volume 50: Explorations by early navigators, descriptions of the islands and their peoples, their history and records of the catholic missions, as related in contemporaneous books and manuscripts, showing the political, economic, commercial and religious conditions of those islands from their earliest relations with European nations to the close of the nineteenth century
Demarcation line of Alexander VI; Missions -- Philippines; Philippines -- Discovery and exploration; Philippines -- History -- Sources
[131] "All the disputes between España and Roma regarding
the nature, extent, and limits of the civil and ecclesiastical
jurisdictions--commonly known by the name of the regalias of the
crown--are reflected in the continual conflicts with the nuncio, the
inquisitor, and the confessor; and from them arose the pase regio
and the disamortization [of corporation lands], in order to make
themselves manifest in the expediente for the beatification of the
venerable Palafox, and to endeavor to find a definitive solution in
the expulsion of the Jesuits. Carlos I and Felipe II of Castilla alike
considered themselves set apart by God to defend eternally the true
faith, with the mission of guarding and protecting the Church; and,
like the ancient Roman emperors, in temporal affairs they acknowledged
no superiority or limitations on the earth. The king was regarded as
a living law, a permanent tribunal, the supreme master and legitimate
lord of all his vassals; in one word, the crown was looked upon as the
defender of the Church. The conflict of the Middle Ages ended, España
aspired to a double social ideal, unity of power and religious unity;
and this thought produced concentration, and the desire to separate
what was spiritual and concerned with dogma from what was temporal
and belonging to the government of peoples. Two distinct ideas strove
together in the field of doctrine; one, supported by the submissions in
former days of the Eastern Empire, claimed to subject temporal monarchs
to the supreme political direction of the head of the Catholic Church;
and the other, derived from primitive traditions, claimed that the
Catholic sovereigns ought to exercise, equally with the pontiffs,
the external government of the Church, as its natural protectors. A
persistent and obstinate strife arose between the two ideas, and after
several centuries the controversy was settled, by limiting the rights
of the Holy See to that which concerned dogmas and the spiritual power,
and leaving to the royal authority all that referred to discipline
and the exercise of government, in whatever relates to the security
of the State and the welfare of the people. It is this which with
some unfitness has been called regalías; and at bottom it has been
nothing more than the recovery of the proper character of the civil
power, and the demarcation of the attributes of the power of the
Church and the State. This demarcation, the strife over which lasted
for entire centuries, was recognized in España by the concordat of
1753, in which is declared the right of [ecclesiastical] patronage
of the kings of España; and to it the exequatur, disamortization,
and the reform of both the regular and secular clergy, served them
as a complement." (Danvila, Reinado de Carlos III, ii, pp. 270, 271.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account