The Philippines: Past and Present (Volume 2 of 2)Worcester, Dean C. (Dean Conant)
History
The Philippines: Past and Present (Volume 2 of 2)
Worcester, Dean C. (Dean Conant)
Philippines; Philippines -- History -- 1898-1946
"The undersigned is strongly opposed to the sending of members of
wild tribes to the United States or to other civilized countries
for exhibition purposes. Apart from all other considerations
experience shows that the men and women thus taken away from their
natural surroundings are apt to be pretty thoroughly spoiled and
to be trouble makers after their return.
"The undersigned has recently informed Mr. R. Schneiderwind that
he would, if necessary, do everything in his power to prevent the
latter gentleman from taking another set of Igorots away from the
Philippines for exhibition purposes. This, too, in spite of the
fact that Mr. Schneiderwind has apparently been very considerate
in his treatment of the Igorots whom he has taken to the United
States for exhibition purposes.
"The undersigned would assume the same attitude toward any other
person endeavouring to obtain Igorots for exhibition purposes."
The advocates of the "united people" theory for these islands are
forced to insist on the unimportance of the non-Christian tribes and
it is needless to say that Blount does this. His contentions on the
subject are rather concisely stated in the following passage:--
"You see our Census of 1903 gave the population of the
Philippines at about 7,600,000 of which 7,000,000 are put down
as civilized Christians; and of the remaining 600,000 about half
are the savage, or semi-civilized, crudely Mohammedan Moros,
in Mindanao, and the adjacent islets down near Borneo. The other
300,000 or so uncivilized people scattered throughout the rest
of the archipelago, the 'non-Christian tribes,' which dwell in
the mountain fastnesses, remote from 'the madding crowd,' cut
little more figure, if any, in the general political equation,
than the American Indian does with us to-day." [40]
If there were ten million American Indians who were in undisputed
occupation of half the territory of the United States, this statement
might in a way approximate the truth. Blount's ten-year-old population
figures are a trifle out of date, but before demonstrating this I
wish to show certain peculiarities in his method of manipulating
them. He says:--
"That the existence of these wild tribes--the dog-eating
Igorrotes and other savages you saw exhibited at the St. Louis
Exposition of 1903-4--constitutes infinitely less reason for
withholding independence from the Filipinos than the American
Indian constituted in 1776 for withholding independence from us,
will be sufficiently apparent from a glance at the following table,
taken from the American Census of the Islands of 1903 (vol. ii.,
p. 123):--
Island Civilized Wild Total
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account