The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
the indivisible, and, in a multiform manner, the uniform exemplars
of things. And, that I may sum up the whole in a few words, they are
placed in the vestibules or entrances of primary forms, and disclose
their indivisible and prolific subsistence collected into one, but
they do not yet excel the division and composition of reasons, and an
essence accommodated to the obscurity of images; nor are they capable
of passing beyond the various notions of the soul, endued with a
discursive power, and of adhering to intellections perfectly simple,
and purified from all material imperfection. After this manner then, is
the middle nature of mathematical genera and forms to be understood; as
filling up the medium between essences entirely indivisible, and such
as are divisible about matter.
CHAP. II.
_Concerning the common Principles of Beings, and of the Mathematical
Essence,[72] bound and infinite._
But it is necessary that, considering the principles of the whole
mathematical essence, we should return to those general principles,
which pervade through and produce all things from themselves, I mean
_bound_ and _infinite_. For from these two after that cause of _one_,
which can neither be explained, nor entirely comprehended, every other
thing, as well as the nature of the mathematical disciplines, is
constituted. In the former, indeed, producing all things collectively
and separately; but in these proceeding in a convenient measure, and
receiving a progression in a becoming order; and in some, subsisting
among primary, but in others among middle, and in others again among
posterior natures. For intelligible genera, by their simplicity of
power, are the first participants of _bound_ and _infinite_: because,
on account of their union and identity, and their firm and stable
existence, they are perfected by bound: but on account of their
division into multitude, their copious power of generation, and their
divine diversity and progression, they obtain the nature of infinite.
But mathematical genera originate, indeed, from bound and infinite,
yet not from primary, intelligible, and occult principles only; but
also from those principles which proceed from the first to a secondary
order, and which are sufficient to produce the middle ornaments of
beings, and the variety which is alternately found in their natures.
Hence, in these also, the reasons and proportions advance to infinity,
but are restrained and confined by that which is the cause of bound.
For number rising from the retreats of unity, receives an incessant
increase, but that which is received as it stops in its progression,
is always finite. Magnitude also suffers an infinite division, yet
all the parts which are divided are bounded, and the particles of the
whole exist finite in energy. So that without the being of infinity,
all magnitudes would be commensurable, and no one would be found but
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account