The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
immediately confer to human utility, (for the ultimate limits of its
progressions, and whatever operates with matter, consider a use of
this kind;) but on the contrary we should admire its immateriality,
and the good which it contains, considered by itself alone. For when
mankind were entirely disengaged from the care of necessary concerns,
they converted themselves to the investigation of the mathematical
disciplines; and this, indeed, with the greatest propriety. Since
affairs familiar to human life in its most imperfect state, and which
are immediately connected with its origin, first of all employed the
studies of mankind: but, in the second place, those concerns succeeded
which separate the soul from generation, and restore its memory of
that which _IS_. After this manner, then, we are engaged in
necessaries, before things honourable for their own sakes, on account
of their intrinsic dignity and worth; and in things related to sense,
before such as are apprehended by the nobler energies of mind. For
every origin and life of the soul which is converted into herself, is
naturally adapted to proceed from the imperfect to the perfect. And
thus much against those who despise the mathematical science.”
CHAP. X.
_A Solution of another Objection of certain Platonists, against the
Utility of the Mathematical Sciences._
But, perhaps, some of our own family will here rise up against us,
and, proposing Plato as a witness, will endeavour to provoke ruder
understandings into a contemptuous disregard of the mathematical
disciplines. For they will say, that this philosopher entirely
excludes (in his Republic) the mathematical knowledge from the choir
of the sciences, and that he accuses it as being ignorant of its own
principles, that its very principle is to itself unknown, and its ends
and mediums composed from things of which it is ignorant. To these
objections they may likewise add whatever other reproaches are there
urged by Socrates against this contemplation. In answer then, to the
objections of our friends, we shall recall into their memory, that
Plato himself perspicuously asserts the mathematical science to be the
purgation of the soul, and that it is endued with a power of leading
it on high; because, like the Homeric Minerva, it removes the darkness
of a sensible nature from the intellectual light of thought, which
is better worth saving than ten thousand corporeal eyes, and which
not only participates of a mercurial gift, (preserving us from the
incantations and delusions of this material abode, which is similar
to the fascinating realms of Circe,) but also of the more divine arts
of Minerva. He likewise every where calls it by the name of science,
and asserts that it is the cause of the greatest felicity to those
who are exercised in its contemplation. But I will briefly explain
why, in the Republic he takes from it the surname of science: for my
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account