The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
But this book is divided into three greatest parts, of which the first
declares the origin and properties of triangles, as well according
to angles, as also according to sides. Besides, it makes mutual
comparisons of these, and beholds every one by itself. For receiving
one triangle, sometimes it considers the angles from the sides; but
sometimes the sides from the angles: and this according to equality
and inequality. And supposing two triangles, it discovers the same
property again, by various methods. But the second part combines the
contemplation of parallelograms, describing their properties and
generations. And the third part shews the communication of triangles
and parallelograms, both in symptoms and mutual comparisons. For it
shews that triangles and parallelograms constituted on the same and on
equal bases, are affected with the same passions; and by complication,
when both stand upon one base: and again, after what manner a
parallelogram may be made equal to a triangle; and lastly, concerning
the proportion which in right angled triangles, the square made from
the side subtending, has to the squares containing the right angle. And
such is the division of the first Book.
But, previous to our enquiry into each of these parts, we think it
requisite to admonish the reader, that he must not require of us,
those small assumptions, and cases, and whatever else there may be of
that kind, which has been divulged by our predecessors. For we are
satiated with these, and shall, therefore, but rarely adopt them in our
discourse. But whatever has a more difficult contemplation, and regards
universal philosophy, of this we shall make a particular relation:
imitating the Pythagoreans, with whom this ænigma was common, “a[124]
figure and a step: but not a figure and three oboli,” shewing by this,
that it is requisite to pursue that philosophy which ascends every
theorem by a step, and raises the soul on high; but does not suffer it
to remain among sensibles, to fill up the use attendant on mortals,
and, consulting for this, to neglect the elevation which rises from
hence to an intelligible essence.
DEFINITIONS.
DEFINITION I.
A POINT is that which has no PARTS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account