The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
by drawing a section between the vertex and the base, which shall
cut the plane of the generative right line, we effect a circular
line. But the idea of lines, shews that the mode of mixture is not by
temperament; for neither does it send us back to the simple nature of
elements: on the contrary, when superficies are cut, they immediately
exhibit to us their producing lines. The mode of mixture, therefore, is
not the same in lines and superficies. But as among lines there were
some simple, that is, the right and circular, of which the vulgar also
possess an anticipated knowledge without any previous instruction;
but the species of mixt lines require a more artificial apprehension:
so among superficies, we possess an innate notion of those which are
especially elementary, the plane and spherical; but science and its
reason investigates the variety of those which are composed through
mixture. But this is an admirable property of superficies, that their
mixture in generation is oftentimes produced from a circular line;
and this also happens to a spiral superficies. For this is understood
by the revolution of a circle remaining erect, and turning itself
about the same point which is not its centre. And on this account, a
spiral also is threefold; for its centre is either in a circumference,
or within, or external to a circumference. If the centre is in
the circumference, a continued spiral is produced: if within the
circumference, an intangled one; if without, a divided one. And there
are three spiral sections corresponding to these three differences.
But every spiral line is mixt, although the motion from which it is
produced is one and circular. And mixt superficies are produced as
well from simple lines, (as we have said,) while they are moved with a
motion of this kind, as from mixt lines. Since, therefore, there are
three conic lines, they produce four mixt superficies, which they call
conoids. For a rectangular conoid, is produced from the revolution of
the parabola about its axis: but that which is formed by the ellipsis,
is called a spheroid; and is the revolution is made about the greater
axis, it is an oblong; but if about the lesser a broad spheroid.
Lastly, an obtuse-angled conoid is generated from the revolution of the
hyperbola. But it is requisite to know, that sometimes we arrive at the
knowledge of superficies from lines, and sometimes the contrary; for
from conical and spiral superficies, we apprehend conical and spiral
lines. Besides, this also must be previously received concerning the
difference of lines and superficies, that there are three lines of
similar parts (as we have already observed), but only two superficies,
the plane and the spherical. For this is not true of the cylindric,
since all parts of the cylindric superficies cannot agree to all. And
thus much concerning the differences of superficies, one of which
the geometrician having chosen (I mean the plane), this also he has
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account